1. its only 140 wide, doubled up in the html
2. About half an hour that one, but I'd already made the Winehouse model
3. No because there are people on here far better than me in other packages and at the end of the day it's not the technique that counts, its the hummus.
(2. About half an hour that one, but I'd already made the Winehouse model
3. No because there are people on here far better than me in other packages and at the end of the day it's not the technique that counts, its the hummus.
HappyToast Groat froth,
Sat 22 Sep 2007, 21:53,
archived)
I think it looks better in 140px mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sat 22 Sep 2007, 21:55,
archived)
This is no time to discuss your private hummusput it away... no one wants to see your spicey kabab..
(
Super piat I am the owl,
Sat 22 Sep 2007, 21:55,
archived)
i'm very impressed anywaywhatever you say.
i'd agree it looks better at 140 though
(i'd agree it looks better at 140 though
boris the spider,
Sat 22 Sep 2007, 21:56,
archived)
it looks better in the original 280 with 60 frames,but I couldn't get that under 500k
( HappyToast Groat froth,
Sat 22 Sep 2007, 21:58,
archived)
hai can understand that. i struggle to get 20 frame animations that jerk like crazy under 300k...
( boris the spider,
Sat 22 Sep 2007, 21:59,
archived)