it's not *that* bigthe b3ta image hoster says it will link anything above 400k, implying that that's about an upper l imit regardless what it says in the faq which is, after all, wildly outdated. this gif is somewhat below that and rather fantastic as well.
(
boris the spider,
Fri 2 Nov 2007, 10:08,
archived)
I'm not saying it's not fantasticJust asking him to link it
And it's only just below 400k
(,
Fri 2 Nov 2007, 10:15,
archived)
And it's only just below 400k
yeahbut you can link a 400kb hoested pic can't you?
EDIT: My daily work bandwidth allowance has just been exceeded!
(EDIT: My daily work bandwidth allowance has just been exceeded!
Sir Aunty Grampa Dave the Hat - enjoying a post-meridian muncheon - Ta! Cannaoogim!?,
Fri 2 Nov 2007, 10:42,
archived)
quick reply to bothof course he could link it and if it were me i would but i'm not sure it's as big an issue as people make out. far from an original point but each time someone posts something slightly over there's a tendency to post about 20 bandwidth-gobbling animations complaining about its size, which is surely worse than one superb gif.
that said, you're right it's only actually just under 400kb. i misread "392" as "352" somehow. i blame stupidity.
(that said, you're right it's only actually just under 400kb. i misread "392" as "352" somehow. i blame stupidity.
boris the spider,
Fri 2 Nov 2007, 11:36,
archived)