
The guy runs a fun messageboard for the general public. He could just as easily choose not to and his life would probably be a lot simpler.
There is no fucking way in hell that I'm going to criticise him for not defending my 'rights' to parody. I know I sure wouldn't defend his or yours.
( ,
Thu 15 Nov 2007, 6:00,
archived)
There is no fucking way in hell that I'm going to criticise him for not defending my 'rights' to parody. I know I sure wouldn't defend his or yours.

i'd defend your rights, and i expect you to defend mine. that's the way society works, or we all have to succumb to the biggest current bullies.
( ,
Thu 15 Nov 2007, 6:02,
archived)

I would do my best to ensure freedom of expression, an environment of fun etc etc, but I wouldn't put my liberty, wallet, marriage or mortgage on the line in order to ensure your ability to publish CDCs on images of celeb du jour. Rob's given us a fabbo place to play hookey and I feel that aside from some moderation to keep the louts away, his "responsibility" ends there.
If Rob doesn't want to deal with the nausea of legal suits caused by the actions of a bunch of people he doesn't know, then that's fine with me!
If people really want to do things that place them knowingly in a line of fire, that's their problem and they can/should find another forum in which to get shot.
( ,
Thu 15 Nov 2007, 6:56,
archived)
If Rob doesn't want to deal with the nausea of legal suits caused by the actions of a bunch of people he doesn't know, then that's fine with me!
If people really want to do things that place them knowingly in a line of fire, that's their problem and they can/should find another forum in which to get shot.