biscuits are not taxablebut CHOCOLATE COVERED biscuits are a luxury item and hence are
(
mutster101 fell over,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:46,
archived)
ahhit all makes a kind of sense
chocolate-covering is too much a part of many cakes for it to be considered additional luxury
(chocolate-covering is too much a part of many cakes for it to be considered additional luxury
plentyofants more ghee, vicar?,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:49,
archived)
And chocolate covered cakeisn't a luxury?
What about chocolate covered Kate? ;)
(What about chocolate covered Kate? ;)
Lazlo Woodbine Panowie!,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:49,
archived)
what about if the chocolate is on the inside?
Mighty Nibus who dares gins | @nibus,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:49,
archived)
and how much additional covering of something elsewould you have to put on top of a chocolate covering for it no longer to be considered chocolate-covered?
( plentyofants more ghee, vicar?,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:53,
archived)