b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7831066 (Thread)

# So listening to Chris Moyles this morning led me to look at the photos on his site
and he pointed out this one which he said was a bit rubbish:

www.bbc.co.uk/radioassets/photos/2007/11/30/32603_2.jpg

So I made it betterer...



Still got Moyles in it but at least the pigeon looks better. BBC graphics department 0 b3ta 2 (here I am including Coast of Yemen's Goatse Olympics)
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:34, archived)
# By default
any pic featuring Moyles is a bit rubbish.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:35, archived)
# unless he features in the 'animal suicides' competition
we could class him with the animals, couldn't we? i don't feel comfortable with him being considered as a human
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:39, archived)
# I like 'im :)
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:46, archived)
# Moyles: Cunt.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:35, archived)
# Congrats!
First ever pic of yours I've hidden C]:0D


(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:36, archived)
# Come on, you love Moyles as much as the next man*




* The next man being Doctor When.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:38, archived)
# ha ha ha.
*contacts de agostini with a partwork idea*
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:41, archived)
# Don't know about you...
...but I really don't want whatever they're giving away on the cover.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:42, archived)
# sweat
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:43, archived)
# unless it's a little bit of moyles that they cut off him every week
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:45, archived)
# Top shoppery there
I thought it was a real pic
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:36, archived)
# Wow,
just say your name and you appear. :D

Did you mean the original or mine?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:37, archived)
# *lurks*
Yours, obviously :P
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:39, archived)
# Well I wasn't sure,
I did check for sarcasm tags but there were none to be found.

In that case, thanks. :D
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:41, archived)
# Heh
I guess I ought to have 'sincere' tags
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:43, archived)
# yeah. i got confused
top work
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:37, archived)
# get back in your toybox, Mohammed
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:39, archived)
# I think a great b3ta mini challenge would be
to go round to all toy shops in you local area and stick 'Hi, my name is Muhammed' stickers on all the teddy bears and then watch and photograph the ensuing panic as shop staff run around trying to peel them all off before a fatwa is issued on the shop owners.

All documented anonymously on the internet of course.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:43, archived)
# Yeah, that'd be ace
but it may lead to serious stuff unfortunately. Damn it.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:47, archived)
# Hm, that gives me an idea
Namely, the one you just said.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:49, archived)
# Feel free,
just don't mention me in any court case that may arise.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:51, archived)
# I can't stand this Moyles person.
And therefore anyone that likes him is wrong and sick, and should be whispered about while they're in the room.

This will be made law very, very soon now.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:37, archived)
# It's really only because
I can't stand commercial radio and can't be bothered with any other national radio station in the morning.

And yes, that includes Radio 2.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:40, archived)
# Someone I work with just told me Jaffacakes
are called 'Jaffacakes' and not 'Jaffa biscuits' because it's a tax break
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:41, archived)
# I've heard that before.
It's was at breakfast after the last Derby bash in fact.

Chunderbunny told us =)
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:42, archived)
# I find facts like this full of intrigue
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:48, archived)
# they were always called jaffa cakes, i think
but there was a court case ages ago to confirm that they were cakes, not biscuits. (and so exempt from vat or something? why are biscuits considered taxable, but cakes a non-taxable essential food?)
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:44, archived)
# biscuits are not taxable
but CHOCOLATE COVERED biscuits are a luxury item and hence are
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:46, archived)
# ahh
it all makes a kind of sense
chocolate-covering is too much a part of many cakes for it to be considered additional luxury
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:49, archived)
# And chocolate covered cake
isn't a luxury?

What about chocolate covered Kate? ;)
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:49, archived)
# what about if the chocolate is on the inside?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:49, archived)
# and how much additional covering of something else
would you have to put on top of a chocolate covering for it no longer to be considered chocolate-covered?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:53, archived)
# It's a government conspiracy to destroy the biscuit industry
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:48, archived)
# i found this out from wikipedia this very week
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:44, archived)
# moyles can kiss my fez
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:42, archived)
# that's really fucking good.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:46, archived)
# Brilliant!
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 12:07, archived)