is it
any image challenge that has 400 posts on day two is a poor image challenge?
edit: though well done for not compoing it.
edit2: oh. (and sorry, it's not you it's me)
( ,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:20,
archived)
edit: though well done for not compoing it.
edit2: oh. (and sorry, it's not you it's me)
its a good image challenge
its just the entries that are at times poor
( ,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:28,
archived)
I've not been paying too much attention
but I imagine it's been a lot of 'right-click - file name'ing with out much hummus.
( ,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:32,
archived)
i think there's two ways an image challenge can go wrong
1. if there's not enough scope to do interesting stuff (the usual way it goes wrong)
2. if it's too easy just to do a quick entry without much thinking (these challenges often seem good at first, but less so after a day's flood of entries)
( ,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:33,
archived)
2. if it's too easy just to do a quick entry without much thinking (these challenges often seem good at first, but less so after a day's flood of entries)