
any image challenge that has 400 posts on day two is a poor image challenge?
edit: though well done for not compoing it.
edit2: oh. (and sorry, it's not you it's me)
( ,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:20,
archived)
edit: though well done for not compoing it.
edit2: oh. (and sorry, it's not you it's me)

its just the entries that are at times poor
( ,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:28,
archived)

but I imagine it's been a lot of 'right-click - file name'ing with out much hummus.
( ,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:32,
archived)

1. if there's not enough scope to do interesting stuff (the usual way it goes wrong)
2. if it's too easy just to do a quick entry without much thinking (these challenges often seem good at first, but less so after a day's flood of entries)
( ,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:33,
archived)
2. if it's too easy just to do a quick entry without much thinking (these challenges often seem good at first, but less so after a day's flood of entries)