(idonthaveafunnynicknameDrink-Aware? Sure. I'm aware I want another drink.,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:15,
archived)
is it
any image challenge that has 400 posts on day two is a poor image challenge?
edit: though well done for not compoing it. edit2: oh. (and sorry, it's not you it's me)
(Holly Wouldlong wheel based tranny,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:20,
archived)
you might want to edit your edit
(mictoboyshitting in your cunt since,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:24,
archived)
I beat you to
it. ;)
(Holly Wouldlong wheel based tranny,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:24,
archived)
no you didn't
but you were very close
(mictoboyshitting in your cunt since,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:28,
archived)
its a good image challenge
its just the entries that are at times poor
(HappyToastGroat froth,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:28,
archived)
I've not been paying too much attention
but I imagine it's been a lot of 'right-click - file name'ing with out much hummus.
(Holly Wouldlong wheel based tranny,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:32,
archived)
yup
or worse, a blatantly obvious, unshopped image
(HappyToastGroat froth,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:36,
archived)
i think there's two ways an image challenge can go wrong
1. if there's not enough scope to do interesting stuff (the usual way it goes wrong) 2. if it's too easy just to do a quick entry without much thinking (these challenges often seem good at first, but less so after a day's flood of entries)
(plentyofantsmore ghee, vicar?,
Thu 13 Dec 2007, 23:33,
archived)
Yes, exactly that
there was always going to be lots of repetition in this one