with the word encyclopaedia even if it is derived from it. It's a registered trade mark and the correct way to spell it is the way they do. If it was registered as 'cuntbolllocks' with three 'Ls' then that would also be correct. I think Cuntbollocks would be more accurate though.
(Pasanonic's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Tue 15 Jan 2008, 23:06,
archived)
Well yes that's true.
But they're still cunts. Just because.
(NobbyNobody21 years a b3tan,
Tue 15 Jan 2008, 23:09,
archived)
aye.
First thing I do when confronted by some smart arse and his wiki links is to ensure I avoid clicking them. I abhor the place and it's spreading of bollocks.
(Pasanonic's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Tue 15 Jan 2008, 23:11,
archived)
I love how my deliberate misspelling caused all this discussion
;)
(mediocreha ha ha, you're reading this,
Tue 15 Jan 2008, 23:11,
archived)
haha
you are talking more bollocks than wikipedia now ;)
(Pasanonic's been known to cause insanity in laboratory mice,
Tue 15 Jan 2008, 23:13,
archived)
Both are wrong actually
it should be spelt wikip[ash]dia. ash is a letter of the alphabet that looks like an a and an e squashed together
(Sheepdeanwas rifling through your underwear drawer on,
Tue 15 Jan 2008, 23:07,
archived)
Share to
Hide / Ignore
Hide
If you want to unhide this post later, click the "update profile" link in the top navigation bar, and scroll down to the bottom.
Ignore
You will be blisfully unaware of this user for just one week