![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Yes, it is partly about oil. Even if you don't have a car, oil is still vital in your everyday life - whether used as fuel or in the production of plastics. In fact without it the computer you're using to read this wouldn't exist. Now the US has its faults, and has some pretty big ones too, but I would rather see that kind of resource in the hands of a regime that can use it reponsibly. Iraq has massive natural resources, none of which is benefiting the people who live there.
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:01,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
So you're saying...
"Even if it is all about oil, Oil's pretty damn useful isn't it?"
... as justification? Fucking grow up man.
Seriously. If you think ^^ your argument up there is more responsible than wanting to keep some oil reserves out of the control of the worlds largest superpower, whose currency controls three quarters of the world's trade, then I pity you.
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:04,
archived)
"Even if it is all about oil, Oil's pretty damn useful isn't it?"
... as justification? Fucking grow up man.
Seriously. If you think ^^ your argument up there is more responsible than wanting to keep some oil reserves out of the control of the worlds largest superpower, whose currency controls three quarters of the world's trade, then I pity you.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Oil is a vital resource, butv it is also a resource that is being misused in Iraq, with very little of its benefits actually reaching the people of the country. Disarmoing Saddam is all well and good, but the only way the people of iraq will get the benefits of their country's enormous natural wealth is by getting rid of him. At the moment it doesn't look likely that he's just going to walk away, does it. I think we both have different viewpoints here, so maybe it's best to agree to disagree.
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:05,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
wrong. You can never justify killing innocent people.
( ,
Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:08,
archived)