b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 815302

# Sing the tune to of 'If You're Happy And You Know It'
If you cannot find Osama, bomb Iraq.
If the markets are a drama, bomb Iraq.
If the terrorists are frisky, Pakistan is looking shifty, North Korea is too
risky, Bomb Iraq.

If we have no allies with us, bomb Iraq.
If we think that someone's dissed us, bomb Iraq.
So to hell with the inspections, Let's look tough for the elections,
Close your mind and take directions, Bomb Iraq.

It's pre-emptive non-aggression, bomb Iraq.
To prevent this mass destruction, bomb Iraq.
They've got weapons we can't see, And that's all the proof we need,
If they're not there, they're lying, Bomb Iraq.

If you never were elected, bomb Iraq.
If your mood is quite dejected, bomb Iraq.
If you think Saddam's gone mad, With the weapons that he had, And he tried
to kill your dad, Bomb Iraq.

If corporate fraud is growin', bomb Iraq.
If your ties to it are showin', bomb Iraq.
If your politics are sleazy, And hiding that ain't easy, And your manhood's
getting queasy, Bomb Iraq.

Fall in line and follow orders, bomb Iraq.
For our might knows not our borders, bomb Iraq.
Disagree? We'll call it treason, Let's make war not love this season, Even
if we have no reason, Bomb Iraq.

(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:18, archived)
# repost mollification successful
please carry on with your tasks.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:19, archived)
# shirley you mean
it's close, but it's not quite right so it is, so it is...
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:23, archived)
# ah begorrah!
Oi left me stereotypographer behoind me blaaaarney stone, so Oi did.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:25, archived)
# does this count as litter?
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:19, archived)
# haha
he has the look of a man who has accidentally followed through.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:20, archived)
# not what i have on the card
but i'll give you the point anyway.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:27, archived)
# That's a great campaign.
If I lived near a war protest - I'd take a banner with that on instead.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:25, archived)
# I saw a photo with a sea of posters saying "No"
I'd have liked to be the guy with the poster saying "dunno"
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:27, archived)
# or you
could hold one saying "There's no limits..."
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:33, archived)
# arf!
That made me do a stupid trying not to laugh out loud sound.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:42, archived)
# rob
the editor of the face mentioned b3ta in an interview with the media guardian yesterday. neil someone.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:28, archived)
# hooray!
he's me + pep + cal's ex boss.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:30, archived)
# is that where
you met?
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:31, archived)
# i've been in The Face, you know
/pub bore
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:50, archived)
# i've got a face, you know
/mental bloke in pub
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:53, archived)
# I've heard
of The Face

/beggar outside pub
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:01, archived)
# i would
if only i could reach
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:38, archived)
# shat yaw maaaf
silly plum

tryina get some sleep over here.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:20, archived)
# If you're bored of people whining...
about Iraqis who keep dying,
then hunt them down and shoot them in the dark.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:21, archived)
# ha ha ha ha ha
ha
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:34, archived)
# personally
I'm coming round to this war. Disarming him peacefully might be possible but the only way to get rid of the fucker is by killing him.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:24, archived)
# They couldn't take him anywhere...
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:26, archived)
# That's my boy
Go on son.

/proud
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:29, archived)
# WAR - HUH, WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR
Stopping the Nazis* say it again now

*insert liberating Kosovo, allowing a free state of Kurdistan to develop, etc.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:37, archived)
# You can add
massive technological progress and creating the free world to that too.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:40, archived)
# if its about liberating the kurds
what's all this "weapons of mass destruction" bullshit - and why hasn't the liberation aspect been mentioned by Bush et al... and only now by Blair because of the widespread cynicism?
Not against overthrowing a tyrant - against the imperialist agenda of the American hegemony.
</rant>
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:46, archived)
# What, and declaring war on the Nazis was about liberating Poland?
?
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:48, archived)
# Partly. It was the invasion of Poland that started the war.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:51, archived)
# It was about stopping Hitler
and that was publicly all it was ever about. Not about some contrived non-compliance rap. In 91, Saddam invaded Kuwait, and while that was about oil, it was right to stop him. This time it isn't. He hasn't done anything he hasn't been doing for years, and we didn't stop him then. What about Tibet? What about Rwanda? What about Zimbabwe? What about Nothern Ireland for fucks sake? isn't it almost the same thing as carpet bombing Belfast to stop the IRA? And you wouldn't fucking support that would you?

read this.

Please... Think of the Agenda
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:52, archived)
# The Sanctions have been imposed since the end of the war
so the UN has had a legitimate gripe since then. So what, the sanctions have most likely killed many more than a war would have. What does that matter.

Edit: Sorry fella - this is a cuddly message board. We should agree to disagree.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:56, archived)
# It matters a lot.
They estimate half a million have died as a direct result of sanctions. Now who do you think is the crueller and more deserving of being removed for the sake of "liberation". Saddam or the US administration?

edit: agreed, but I still find it abhorrent that anyone can support the US agenda in this case.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:00, archived)
# STOP!
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:03, archived)
# So it's right because this piece of paper says it is?
Bollocks to that - in the end, it's not countries that vote at the UN, it's a single guy in a grey suit voting "yes", "no" or "abstain". They vote the way they are directed by their respective leader.

If you want to look for a national leader with a criminal past, who has signed death warrants for his own citizens, who has a nuculur(sic) arsenal, a country with plenty of Anthrax (recently used in attacks on it's own citizens) - a history of chemical weapons use, look no further than the good ol' US of A.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:05, archived)
# .
.

Kittens
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:08, archived)
# Be fluffy
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:14, archived)
# What really fucks me off with the "it's all about oil" argument is this:
Yes, it is partly about oil. Even if you don't have a car, oil is still vital in your everyday life - whether used as fuel or in the production of plastics. In fact without it the computer you're using to read this wouldn't exist. Now the US has its faults, and has some pretty big ones too, but I would rather see that kind of resource in the hands of a regime that can use it reponsibly. Iraq has massive natural resources, none of which is benefiting the people who live there.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:01, archived)
# I'm not sure I can entertain that with a response.
So you're saying...

"Even if it is all about oil, Oil's pretty damn useful isn't it?"

... as justification? Fucking grow up man.

Seriously. If you think ^^ your argument up there is more responsible than wanting to keep some oil reserves out of the control of the worlds largest superpower, whose currency controls three quarters of the world's trade, then I pity you.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:04, archived)
# That's not what I'm saying.
Oil is a vital resource, butv it is also a resource that is being misused in Iraq, with very little of its benefits actually reaching the people of the country. Disarmoing Saddam is all well and good, but the only way the people of iraq will get the benefits of their country's enormous natural wealth is by getting rid of him. At the moment it doesn't look likely that he's just going to walk away, does it. I think we both have different viewpoints here, so maybe it's best to agree to disagree.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:05, archived)
# You're just
wrong. You can never justify killing innocent people.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:08, archived)
# Munich
Dambusters raids?

You can I'm afraid - sad as it is, war is

Kittens
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:09, archived)
# Look up
/\
||
||
||
||
please!
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:08, archived)
# sorry
I'll keep to kittens in future.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:09, archived)
# Agreed to disagree
despite the descendence into the spaz.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:12, archived)
# still here
agreed.
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 13:17, archived)
# I quite like Terry "Python" Jones viewpoint
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:49, archived)
# Yeah, they tried with Reagan, didn't work.
Maybe a war is the only way, but which city should we invade first? LA, DC, Dallas?
(, Tue 18 Feb 2003, 12:58, archived)