
by the way, yesterday micto called you a tosser, i tried to put him right but he persisted, it got quite heated for a while until he gave in and prefixed it with scouse, we're friends again now.
( ,
Mon 10 Mar 2008, 19:53,
archived)

and may I take this opportunity to mock all the spineless 'anonymous' posters to the 'give Mongy his account back' petition.
It's fine if you don't want him back, perhaps he deserves it, but to not even have the balls to put your name to an online petition... well, that's just pathetic.
boooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!
( ,
Mon 10 Mar 2008, 19:58,
archived)
It's fine if you don't want him back, perhaps he deserves it, but to not even have the balls to put your name to an online petition... well, that's just pathetic.
boooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!

Particularly the tosser bit.
( ,
Mon 10 Mar 2008, 19:59,
archived)

But yes, I was thinking the same thing. It's pretty pathetic.
( ,
Mon 10 Mar 2008, 20:03,
archived)

and i agree with the second bit although i am not one of mongy's greatest fans, we have a few differences in taste. i think the ban thing should be sorted by the mods, ip addresses should sort it. if he was responsible for the scat stuff then it's tuff shit and bye bye, if not no doubt i'll get to ignore him again in the future, i only unignored him a week ago and oddly clicked the first image of his that i then saw.
( ,
Mon 10 Mar 2008, 20:05,
archived)

Mongy's ACCOUNT has been (rightly imho) suspended not HIM.
I'm sure the mods and he can sort it out but in the meantime I do not understand how anyone can argue that suspending HIS ACCOUNT was the wrong thing to do.
If indeed another person has access to his account then that had to be stopped.

( ,
Mon 10 Mar 2008, 20:18,
archived)
I'm sure the mods and he can sort it out but in the meantime I do not understand how anyone can argue that suspending HIS ACCOUNT was the wrong thing to do.
If indeed another person has access to his account then that had to be stopped.
