Phil whould make a better doctor than david tennant/hates tennant blog.
(,
Tue 20 May 2008, 11:35,
archived)
no!i would do teninch, but not fuckup phil.
(
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Tue 20 May 2008, 11:39,
archived)
it's not a question of boofing the lead characterIt's a matter of how terrible they are compared with Tom Baker.
(,
Tue 20 May 2008, 11:41,
archived)
Sylvester McCoy is second to Tom Baker, then EcclestonPertwee, Hartnell, Throughton, Davidson, Colin Baker, Tennant then Paul McCann. Colin Baker suffered because of the production disputes at the time and McCann was just pisspoor in that stupid movie. Tennant is a faggy git who I find unwatchable.
(,
Tue 20 May 2008, 11:51,
archived)
McCoy: too lame,Eccleston: too smug,
Pertwee: too wholesome,
Hartnell: too ancient,
Colin Baker: too anxious,
Tennant: too squeaky.
Troughton was kind of cool. Davidson was alright.
(,
Tue 20 May 2008, 12:06,
archived)
Pertwee: too wholesome,
Hartnell: too ancient,
Colin Baker: too anxious,
Tennant: too squeaky.
Troughton was kind of cool. Davidson was alright.
I think Hartnell is a bit different given that he was the originaland the writers never anticipated regeneration...
What about Tom Baker?
(,
Tue 20 May 2008, 12:10,
archived)
What about Tom Baker?
I didn't mention Tom Bakersince he actually is Doctor Who, as everybody knows.
(,
Tue 20 May 2008, 12:15,
archived)
i like itat least the creatures look better nowadays. the stories are often darker, too.
( Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Tue 20 May 2008, 11:46,
archived)
That's not really a good thing though.The writing bounds from dark to whimsical to predicatable morality tale so often it would make your head spin if you hadn't have already sawn it off due to the dialogue.
(,
Tue 20 May 2008, 11:54,
archived)
i find the change of pace quite interestingalthough i must admit, if you're a fan of a particular writing style, it could be very irritating.
( Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Tue 20 May 2008, 12:02,
archived)
I'm just a fan of good writing.I watched it because it was Doctor Who and was escapism even with the massive writing flaws, but I think Catherine Tate was the massive rotting disgusting whore that broke the camel's back...or something.
It makes the writing in Star Trek seem laudable.
(,
Tue 20 May 2008, 12:07,
archived)
It makes the writing in Star Trek seem laudable.
i thought she'd kill it stone deadfortunately, she hasn't tried to be funny very often.
still, how is that any different? she was never funny.
(still, how is that any different? she was never funny.
Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet,
Tue 20 May 2008, 12:10,
archived)
I do as well but Tennant needs to get the sackCan't act at all.
/hasn't seen Blackpool or the "We are loonies and we are proud" thingo.
(,
Tue 20 May 2008, 11:54,
archived)
/hasn't seen Blackpool or the "We are loonies and we are proud" thingo.
I havent seen any of him bar the christmas episode last year,but I do really like him. I saw his interview on Jonathan Ross and I think he seems like a cracking bloke!
(
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Tue 20 May 2008, 11:56,
archived)
eh, I just don't like to watch him ponce around on my televisionmight be a champ to have a beer and a pool game with though.
(,
Tue 20 May 2008, 12:03,
archived)
Tom Baker thinks he's marvellous.
Captain Wow currently being a cunt in Infamous,
Tue 20 May 2008, 12:07,
archived)
Arf!These are the phone boxes in Lausanne, and I rather think they look Tardis like....
i34.photobucket.com/albums/d105/mcomme/Switzerland/Lausanne/MichaelsPics122.jpg
(i34.photobucket.com/albums/d105/mcomme/Switzerland/Lausanne/MichaelsPics122.jpg
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Tue 20 May 2008, 11:37,
archived)