
to begin with
Also: why do they signpost them?
I thought the idea was to catch criminals not let them know when they'll get caught.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:17,
archived)
Also: why do they signpost them?
I thought the idea was to catch criminals not let them know when they'll get caught.

I'd've thunk
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:22,
archived)

Telling a criminal when they have to slow down
If you have to slow down in the first place then you're already breaking the law.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:24,
archived)
If you have to slow down in the first place then you're already breaking the law.

slam on the breaks and get rear-ended, it can end in serious injury to the non-guilty party behind.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:44,
archived)

Speeding just doesn't help matters at all.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:54,
archived)

when cameras are being used on a stretch of road and likewise, they have to paint them to be highly visible when any of the fine is kept by the police force. The point being they are intended as a road safety measure (make people slow down) rather than a sneaky money gathering device.
But whatever the reason for them, driving at or under the speed limit (even a little over probably) means no fines. It is up to the individual if they obey the speed limit or not, but if you want to break it there is no point being a big baby and crying about the fine when you get caught.
I say this as someone who has been caught speeding, although not by a camera.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:23,
archived)
But whatever the reason for them, driving at or under the speed limit (even a little over probably) means no fines. It is up to the individual if they obey the speed limit or not, but if you want to break it there is no point being a big baby and crying about the fine when you get caught.
I say this as someone who has been caught speeding, although not by a camera.