![Challenge Entry: Literal Road Signs [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

From the Literal Road Signs challenge. See all 665 entries (closed)
( , Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:06, archived)

about speed cameras being a money making device for the police, which may be true, but it's really easy to avoid paying the fines. Just take your foot off the pedal on the right and apply it to the middle pedal.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:09,
archived)

to begin with
Also: why do they signpost them?
I thought the idea was to catch criminals not let them know when they'll get caught.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:17,
archived)
Also: why do they signpost them?
I thought the idea was to catch criminals not let them know when they'll get caught.

I'd've thunk
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:22,
archived)

Telling a criminal when they have to slow down
If you have to slow down in the first place then you're already breaking the law.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:24,
archived)
If you have to slow down in the first place then you're already breaking the law.

slam on the breaks and get rear-ended, it can end in serious injury to the non-guilty party behind.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:44,
archived)

Speeding just doesn't help matters at all.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:54,
archived)

when cameras are being used on a stretch of road and likewise, they have to paint them to be highly visible when any of the fine is kept by the police force. The point being they are intended as a road safety measure (make people slow down) rather than a sneaky money gathering device.
But whatever the reason for them, driving at or under the speed limit (even a little over probably) means no fines. It is up to the individual if they obey the speed limit or not, but if you want to break it there is no point being a big baby and crying about the fine when you get caught.
I say this as someone who has been caught speeding, although not by a camera.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:23,
archived)
But whatever the reason for them, driving at or under the speed limit (even a little over probably) means no fines. It is up to the individual if they obey the speed limit or not, but if you want to break it there is no point being a big baby and crying about the fine when you get caught.
I say this as someone who has been caught speeding, although not by a camera.

If you don't see anything, you carry on speeding.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:29,
archived)

IT'S NOT FAIR, WE CAN'T SEE THEM AND YOU'RE TRICKING US.
Well, here's an idea. Don't break the speed limit, and you won't get caught. Then it doesn't matter if you can see them or not, you fucking dolt.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:17,
archived)
Well, here's an idea. Don't break the speed limit, and you won't get caught. Then it doesn't matter if you can see them or not, you fucking dolt.

If you really need to get somewhere, then try organising your life better so you can leave earlier.
I mean it's not like if there's a traffic jam you're allowed to drive up the other side of the road (which some guy did the other day, and he was pissed off at us for being in his way while he was driving down the wrong side of the road)
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:19,
archived)
I mean it's not like if there's a traffic jam you're allowed to drive up the other side of the road (which some guy did the other day, and he was pissed off at us for being in his way while he was driving down the wrong side of the road)


It's fucking stupid, if you get caught, you were breaking the law. If you want to bitch and moan about not knowing there was a speed camera there, you can get fucked. There are signs pointing out the speed limit, it's not rocket science.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:25,
archived)

but it was installed by his company, and apparently he's not breaking any laws... I think it's to do with the type of warning... he says this one just indicates where a camera is likely to be, rather than detecting them, which is illegal.
( ,
Mon 30 Jun 2008, 0:29,
archived)
