he could always link to his original version without the scanlines
there's several options
( ,
Sat 9 Aug 2008, 12:17,
archived)
Bob is right, and I wasn't being a 'nazi' about the file size, they are only suggested guidelines
those days are long gone. (for me at least)
I thought a little friendly help would be better, as there's been far too much bloody board nazi stuff going on of late, particularly at times that Cockweasle mentions above. :(
( ,
Sat 9 Aug 2008, 12:32,
archived)
I thought a little friendly help would be better, as there's been far too much bloody board nazi stuff going on of late, particularly at times that Cockweasle mentions above. :(
nah you were being quite helpful
but some people seem to carry on like a toddler with a turd in their pants:
www.b3ta.com/board/8629020
Edit: I've optimised evilscary's fail pic down to half it's filesize, with absolutely no aliasing/artifacts/loss of quality. People's lack of logic bothers me sometimes.
( ,
Sat 9 Aug 2008, 12:39,
archived)
www.b3ta.com/board/8629020
Edit: I've optimised evilscary's fail pic down to half it's filesize, with absolutely no aliasing/artifacts/loss of quality. People's lack of logic bothers me sometimes.
ah yes, that was one of the cases I was thinking of :)
There's no need for it, no wonder some of the 'old timers' don't post much anymore,
and that some of the really talented newcomers don't stick for long. Tis a pity
( ,
Sat 9 Aug 2008, 12:40,
archived)
and that some of the really talented newcomers don't stick for long. Tis a pity
there was similarly no need for yan's tantrum
when someone else was fairly polite about a large image. although I did kindof agree with his sentiment he just didn't pick a good post to flounce on.
And yes tis a pity people get annoyed and leave. Means we're stuck with gits like me.
( ,
Sat 9 Aug 2008, 12:47,
archived)
And yes tis a pity people get annoyed and leave. Means we're stuck with gits like me.