![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
are that if terrorists want to make any head way into 'terrorising' the UK they can't use tactics like september 11th bombings.. as that more fits an American audience.. who are overly dramatical.. British just get on with it.. as seen in july 7th.
what the terrorists need to do is get petty, Really petty. Like create a device that destroys all alarm clocks and simultaneously destroys every kettle and means to boil water.
the country instantly would be brought to it's knees.
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 1:32,
archived)
what the terrorists need to do is get petty, Really petty. Like create a device that destroys all alarm clocks and simultaneously destroys every kettle and means to boil water.
the country instantly would be brought to it's knees.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
this idea has converted me to fundamental islamism.
*begins by banning smoking in pubs*
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 1:37,
archived)
*begins by banning smoking in pubs*
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
called The Islamist.. it's by a bloek who was in a radical islamic group thingy.. but yeah.. smoking is anti muslim but this particular faction, hizb ut tahrir, encouraged it as their main leader could only think while chain smoking.
marvelous news.
they are also the group osama got most of his ideas from.
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 1:40,
archived)
marvelous news.
they are also the group osama got most of his ideas from.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
well
I read bits a pieces of the Koran, but it was boring in bits and i kind of just scanned about, unless there were bits i'd heard of, or caught my interest. I have intended for years now, to spend some time reading all the religious texts, as I have them all, but I just have never felt like it since I got them.
I've not opened the bible since I was in sunday school and i was chosen to read in front of the congregation because I was a "good reader"/not a mong.
(also, I'm all atheisty and scientish, but I want to read all the religy books to try and understand the major malfunction)
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 1:45,
archived)
I read bits a pieces of the Koran, but it was boring in bits and i kind of just scanned about, unless there were bits i'd heard of, or caught my interest. I have intended for years now, to spend some time reading all the religious texts, as I have them all, but I just have never felt like it since I got them.
I've not opened the bible since I was in sunday school and i was chosen to read in front of the congregation because I was a "good reader"/not a mong.
(also, I'm all atheisty and scientish, but I want to read all the religy books to try and understand the major malfunction)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I see it a little like that...
but I prefer to see the majority as having a disease.
Religion can be compared to zombie movies. You'd feel sorry for people you knew being infected by the T-virus, and wouldn't necessarily view them automatically as an enemy.
However, there are the rabid slavering cunts who tend to attract all the intention, who would get both barrels if they cornered me in a dark cellar.
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 1:53,
archived)
but I prefer to see the majority as having a disease.
Religion can be compared to zombie movies. You'd feel sorry for people you knew being infected by the T-virus, and wouldn't necessarily view them automatically as an enemy.
However, there are the rabid slavering cunts who tend to attract all the intention, who would get both barrels if they cornered me in a dark cellar.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
they're just sheep. no, my problem is with the pricks who run these religions, be they catholic, hindu, muslim, or whatever. just beause they believe in mystical fairies doesn't mean they have the right to force others to follow their fucked-up delusions.
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 1:56,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
rather than questioning. and then use that as some kind of answer when pushed too far by qestioning "you'll understand if you just accept me and right and believe in god then it will become clear" It wont become clear.. it's just i'll stop trying to look for an obstruction.
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 2:04,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
we have free will for a reason. subjugating ourselves in the name of religion is never a good thing.
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 2:09,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
/omid djalili blog
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 1:57,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
especially when he does his belly-dancing bit
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 1:59,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
what's funnier is fundementalist christians attempts to defend the weirdness..
the first lots of humans created by le god.. the progeny of adam and eve.. incest ignored.. all lived to well past 700 years of age.. some not having kids till they were over 400..
bringing this up one fundementalists defence was that when the earth was made their was an ice crust around it creating a different atmospheric pressure..thsu they could live for longer..
it's brilliant. so much of their life is built with faith as the core route of their understanding that you can't shift it because if you do what they know of themselves would be forced to collapse with it... the mind is a bit fascinating.
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 1:51,
archived)
the first lots of humans created by le god.. the progeny of adam and eve.. incest ignored.. all lived to well past 700 years of age.. some not having kids till they were over 400..
bringing this up one fundementalists defence was that when the earth was made their was an ice crust around it creating a different atmospheric pressure..thsu they could live for longer..
it's brilliant. so much of their life is built with faith as the core route of their understanding that you can't shift it because if you do what they know of themselves would be forced to collapse with it... the mind is a bit fascinating.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
albeit dead. But a rabbit!
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
yes.
well, I obviously agree, being that I'm (I FUCKING HOPE) a couple of months away from being a Phd in psychology...
but
in the case of religion it might not necessarily be that strange. I would be willing to bet a lot of money that if children were given balanced information about religion and science between the ages of 4 yrs and 8/9yrs, then the majority of children would grown up to be atheist or sentimental agnostic.
My opinion (without knowing an enormous amount about this area) is that children who learn about religion during the language stage of development, will be hiiiighly probably to retain religious opinion throughout their lives.
*drunk oponions on the intnutz*
( ,
Sun 10 Aug 2008, 2:04,
archived)
well, I obviously agree, being that I'm (I FUCKING HOPE) a couple of months away from being a Phd in psychology...
but
in the case of religion it might not necessarily be that strange. I would be willing to bet a lot of money that if children were given balanced information about religion and science between the ages of 4 yrs and 8/9yrs, then the majority of children would grown up to be atheist or sentimental agnostic.
My opinion (without knowing an enormous amount about this area) is that children who learn about religion during the language stage of development, will be hiiiighly probably to retain religious opinion throughout their lives.
*drunk oponions on the intnutz*