b3ta.com board

Home » Messageboard » Robots in History » Message 8676010

Napalm my arse

From the Robots in History challenge. See all 398 entries (closed)

(robneymcplum spiced up his life on, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:25, archived)

what is it with everyone using THIS source pic recently?

(

theoriginalsteve <this space intentionally left blank>, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:26, archived)

I can only assume that we're being trolled in an major way.

(

Ttssattsr, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:27, archived)

It is really is getting tedious.......

.....still, the hide post button still works....

(

theoriginalsteve <this space intentionally left blank>, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:29, archived)

I prefer to adblock so I can troll the troll.

(

Ttssattsr, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:29, archived)

n00b question: how the hell does this adblock stuff work?

(

theoriginalsteve <this space intentionally left blank>, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:33, archived)

I'm no troll

Just hadn't seen it already done, which I now have. D'oh.

(robneymcplum spiced up his life on, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:32, archived)

Some people neglect to understand the subtleties of

offensive humour. Like the difference between it and just being offensive.

In my humble opinion, anyway.

(

Captain Wow currently being a cunt in Infamous, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:28, archived)

I agree....

(

theoriginalsteve <this space intentionally left blank>, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:29, archived)

I concur.

(

(|D[ekionplexis B3ta.com: fictional child porn is OK, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:31, archived)

I except no better from you.

(

Captain Wow currently being a cunt in Infamous, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:33, archived)

You will,..you wiiiill.

(

(|D[ekionplexis B3ta.com: fictional child porn is OK, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:33, archived)

sigh

wanders off again

(

prodigy69 broke b3ta and made everyone leave, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:27, archived)

*napalms robneymcplum's arse*

(

WHTRZ Corp dosen't like the sound of Rupert watching porn, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:27, archived)

No, just no

This is not a nice image at all, i do not like it.
Also you must have seen the what happened yesterday, although maybe you are trying to prove a point by doing this in which case
please kindly fuck off

(yfky should be trying to get a job, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:32, archived)

I don't see the problem.

(

(|D[ekionplexis B3ta.com: fictional child porn is OK, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:33, archived)

It's a personal thing, but a lot of people came out and said

that using this picture pushes the boundaries of sick humour that bit too far.

(

Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:35, archived)

Oh right.

Fuck 'em.

(

(|D[ekionplexis B3ta.com: fictional child porn is OK, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:36, archived)

I'm not so sure.

I'm not overly concerned by the pic myself, but I don't see why fucking off a lot of people on the board is such a nice thing to do either.

(

Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:37, archived)

Taking away the history and pain of the picture

it's still a full frontal naked child. That's NSFW.

(

Captain Wow currently being a cunt in Infamous, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:38, archived)

And naked children is also none-too-good even when not at work

(

Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:39, archived)

Fair enough..

Some things I find offensive too, I don't mind peoples right to post whatever they want. Its personal choice and freedom of speech etc. For every 1 I find offensive, there are 100s that are funny, I'm prepared to put up with that ratio TBH.

(robneymcplum spiced up his life on, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:39, archived)

This is just my opinion

but i dont like to see a naked child in very real, very clear pain and anguish

(yfky should be trying to get a job, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:36, archived)

That's a night out for me.

(

(|D[ekionplexis B3ta.com: fictional child porn is OK, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:38, archived)

I have to stay in to get that kind of action

(yfky should be trying to get a job, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:39, archived)

what happened yesterdaay?

I don't know?

(robneymcplum spiced up his life on, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:33, archived)

this is an image most people on the board hate, due to it's grotesque and graphic contents. using it is frowned upon. Yesterday it cropped up a number of times, and people are sick of it.

(

theoriginalsteve <this space intentionally left blank>, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:35, archived)

maddie lol

oh wait...
glitter lol

oh wait...
starving african kid with vupture lol

oh wait...
FUCKING HITLER LOL! Just so you know, here in Germany having images of hitler or nazi symbols on yor screen is not only considered bad taste, but might be considered illegal

oh, i forgot...
mong kids lol

...let me do a b3ta image search for 'hull'

so tasteful and funny... www.b3ta.com/board/8507445

(Your watch is still saving for 5K but has learnt about 'nose bondage', Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:44, archived)

I want to know why Germany have done that with the swastika.

It's pointless trying to cover up history.
I get why they've done it, but it's got to be worse banning it.

(

Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:48, archived)

the idea is to avoid celebratory sites

the usage is permissible, but the onus is on the owner to justify it

(Your watch is still saving for 5K but has learnt about 'nose bondage', Fri 22 Aug 2008, 16:53, archived)

For fuck's sake

why is it that every time I log on to b3ta recently some fuckwit has shopped this photo?

Screaming, terrified childeren in a warzone do not comedy make. Ever.

(

Fishcat Difficult difficult lemon difficult., Fri 22 Aug 2008, 17:03, archived)

Have it with no kids then.

(robneymcplum spiced up his life on, Fri 22 Aug 2008, 17:20, archived)