b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8699195 (Thread)

# You would have less sugar
if you consider the sugar to be one flowing item, like a liquid. If you were referring to the individual sugar grains, you would use fewer.

I don't make the rules, I just have to slavishly insure that everybody else follows them ;)
(, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:23, archived)
# Ahh. But it brings up the old philosophical issue:
I have a pile of sand (or sugar, I suppose but what the hell am I doing with a pile of sugar for fuck's sake?!) and I remove a grain from the top of the pile.

I continue to remove grains from the pile, one at a time; at what point does it stop being a pile of sand? When one grain is left? 10 grains? There is no real distinction between masses of things and groups of things.
(, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:27, archived)
# Sand thief!
:D
(, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:29, archived)
# When I do a poo on it and rub it into your hair.
Then it's just "smelly hair sand".
(, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:31, archived)
# I sort of know a song about that (sortof)
(, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:37, archived)
# There may not be a difference philosophically
but there is a difference in everyday language.

If I ask a greengrocer for a bunch of grapes and he hands me a single grape, arguments about philosophy are not going to make me buy it.

[edit] On reflection, i think what you have identified is simply vague language, rather than any philosophical idea. A 'pile' of sand is a relative term which may mean something different to everyone, whereas 'ten tons of sand' is a specific value that there can be no doubt about.
(, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:32, archived)
# http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_the_heap
(, Sun 31 Aug 2008, 12:39, archived)