
But yes, yes it is.
THIS IS A VERY NSFW LINK- DO NOT BLAME ME IF YOU CLICK IT AND ARE FOR SOME UNFATHOMABLE REASON NOT EXPECTING A GIRL SHITTING ON HER OWN FACE IN SUPERHEROIC FASHION images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/9/98/Tubgirl.jpg
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:02,
archived)
THIS IS A VERY NSFW LINK- DO NOT BLAME ME IF YOU CLICK IT AND ARE FOR SOME UNFATHOMABLE REASON NOT EXPECTING A GIRL SHITTING ON HER OWN FACE IN SUPERHEROIC FASHION images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/9/98/Tubgirl.jpg

is why she went to the effort of cutting eye holes in those pieces of plasticy cheese you put in burgers.
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:04,
archived)

I always thought that, anyway. Cosplay etc.
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:05,
archived)

but due to whatever fetishry it is that provokes that kind of behaviour, she still wanted her own shit in her eyes.
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:06,
archived)

and I'm still hopeful about the superhero outfit.
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:12,
archived)

Sex offenders don't could as superheroes no matter how you dress them up (or not, in most cases).
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:15,
archived)

Costumes are rife in fetish. You're more than likely right though.
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:18,
archived)

I imagine she would be.
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:20,
archived)


that pubic hair is strictly forbidden
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:08,
archived)

Although they usually uniformly mosaic rather than blur, probably so people who find pixels arousing can wank their rotten cocks stupid.
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:08,
archived)

well, a few pages. No vagina. Well, not on her.
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:11,
archived)

it's almost instinctive
perhaps she should see a therapist
( ,
Wed 17 Sep 2008, 21:05,
archived)
perhaps she should see a therapist