only because you know I'm right and you won't admit it to yourself Bowie is a talent who has changed generations with varying styles of music, and he earns respect for such talent.
Singing a few whiney songs to a reptitive guitar riff, then realising how shit they are you have to take a shotgun
to yourself does not make Cobain any sort of musical 'legend' as many would have us believe.
and as for Battenburg....
(Singing a few whiney songs to a reptitive guitar riff, then realising how shit they are you have to take a shotgun
to yourself does not make Cobain any sort of musical 'legend' as many would have us believe.
and as for Battenburg....
The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:35,
archived)
How big would Nirvana be if he didn't kill himself?But I ask myself the same question about The Beatles and John Lennon.
Also you are on Jonathon Ross. ; )
(Also you are on Jonathon Ross. ; )
Mstandot I suppose I should post more often.,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:41,
archived)
So I hear *multitasking*Nirvana would probably have gone downhill as most artists/groups do when their 'niche' becomes oversaturated in the market
with lots of spin-off groups, solo projects, imitators and pretenders to the throne.
Most groups do.
The Beatles, along with artists such as Bowie, Queen to name but two more, varied styles over different eras, marketing themselves out
to different groups and styles. That's what kept them 'big'
(with lots of spin-off groups, solo projects, imitators and pretenders to the throne.
Most groups do.
The Beatles, along with artists such as Bowie, Queen to name but two more, varied styles over different eras, marketing themselves out
to different groups and styles. That's what kept them 'big'
The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:43,
archived)
makes a change ;) The Great Architect is still waiting for his account to be deleted on,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:56,
archived)