ok that's a bit harsh
but, they are not worth the excessive hype that surrounds them.
nor are flight of the conchords whilst we're on it. both are fairly amusing, but are nothing new, and are massively over-rated (almost to Gervais/Little Britain proportions, except of course that Little Britain isn't amusing in any way)
I also find it amusing that my brother's got an old flyer from his SU (about 8 years+ old) with Noel Fielding appearing as one of the comics
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 23:15,
archived)
nor are flight of the conchords whilst we're on it. both are fairly amusing, but are nothing new, and are massively over-rated (almost to Gervais/Little Britain proportions, except of course that Little Britain isn't amusing in any way)
I also find it amusing that my brother's got an old flyer from his SU (about 8 years+ old) with Noel Fielding appearing as one of the comics
Jullian Barratt was class in Nathan Barley, im not a massive fan of the boosh,
but the earlier boosh was better
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 23:18,
archived)
still ain't seen that
keep meaning to see if it's on 4od for free
didn't fielding have a few appearances in that?
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 23:21,
archived)
didn't fielding have a few appearances in that?
Yeah fielding was a minor character, not really does anything of note,
whereas Barratt is quality in it.
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 23:24,
archived)
not seen
any of the conchords tv show, just some of their live stuff, but whenever i'm round my ex's she shoves their youtube vids down my throat
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 23:23,
archived)
I havent seen and conchords, all ive heard is good things about it
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 23:25,
archived)
you take that back about the Conchords
OF COURSE THEY'RE NOT NEW, THEY'VE BEEN AROUND FOR FUCKING YEARS
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 23:36,
archived)
OF COURSE THEY'RE NOT NEW, THEY'VE BEEN AROUND FOR FUCKING YEARS
they are over-hyped
over here and in the states anyway.
and i don't think they've ever claimed to be new or clever. read an interview with them in Q a couple of months ago and they came across really well. not total cunts
same can't be said of the boosh who are suing Quaker beacause of the way the honey monster talks in one of the ads.
there's no way they can lay claim to that, nor any reason why they'd want to
( ,
Mon 6 Oct 2008, 23:40,
archived)
and i don't think they've ever claimed to be new or clever. read an interview with them in Q a couple of months ago and they came across really well. not total cunts
same can't be said of the boosh who are suing Quaker beacause of the way the honey monster talks in one of the ads.
there's no way they can lay claim to that, nor any reason why they'd want to