Errr read his post again,and then comment. He didnt deny Global warming is happening. He said that there is still debate over what is the cause.
Dick.
(Dick.
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Wed 15 Oct 2008, 9:42,
archived)
yesand the debate about the causes is over. The vast majority of scientific journals support the view that climate change is being causes by human activity.
This is just the fallback position for people who spent years claiming that global warming isn't happening at all, until that view became untenable.
(This is just the fallback position for people who spent years claiming that global warming isn't happening at all, until that view became untenable.
Finite "Aardvark sorted out my shit!" on,
Wed 15 Oct 2008, 9:45,
archived)
Thank you sirI'm actually quite for saving the environment, but not for running around spending HUGE amounts of cash on stuff that only buys certain people bigger houses and won't fix anything.
Better things would be a global fund that provides and monitor sufficient solutions.
Look a bit further then only your country and help the real polluting parts of the world like AMERICA, INDIA, CHINA, RUSSIA and/or eastern European country's.
(Better things would be a global fund that provides and monitor sufficient solutions.
Look a bit further then only your country and help the real polluting parts of the world like AMERICA, INDIA, CHINA, RUSSIA and/or eastern European country's.
Floppy Donkey crawled out of the ditch.,
Wed 15 Oct 2008, 9:48,
archived)
no, there isn'tthe concept of the "debate" was invented by Neo-Cons and oil companies as part of a (now failed) strategy to stop them from having to do anything about it. In reality there is complete consensus among climatologists as to the human cause of global warming. The only people who now uphold the concept of this "debate" going on are a handful of conspiracy theory nutters and the like.
(,
Wed 15 Oct 2008, 16:11,
archived)