
The speed of your replies (such as this morning) says that you do not think, as you say, which is why I was concerned about you.
Whatever has fixed such a bias in you that you hate without consideration in this way should be purged, for your sake.
Unless of course you are Scottish, in which case keep bottling it up. It's for the best.
( ,
Fri 17 Oct 2008, 15:06,
archived)
Whatever has fixed such a bias in you that you hate without consideration in this way should be purged, for your sake.
Unless of course you are Scottish, in which case keep bottling it up. It's for the best.

I don't hate either. I dislike you a bit, taking previous evidence into account. I'm not putting you on ignore, because you do post decent pictures now and then when you're not being a dick.
As for your final comments there, about purging hatred, and generalising the psychology of a country, I'm afraid you're showing yourself up a bit.
I've put my point across. I'll try not to upset you again.
( ,
Fri 17 Oct 2008, 15:14,
archived)
As for your final comments there, about purging hatred, and generalising the psychology of a country, I'm afraid you're showing yourself up a bit.
I've put my point across. I'll try not to upset you again.

How you can read the sentences: "Unless of course you are Scottish, in which case keep bottling it up. It's for the best." in a serious tone is, to be frank, a little beyond me.
It probably explains why you think I am rude though.
I am not going to stop being a dick though, it is kind of what b3ta is for. I was being enough of a dick to get banned before you even found us.
( ,
Fri 17 Oct 2008, 15:20,
archived)
It probably explains why you think I am rude though.
I am not going to stop being a dick though, it is kind of what b3ta is for. I was being enough of a dick to get banned before you even found us.

But you shouldn't be so surprised when people are dicks to you in return.
I think my interpretation of that sentence was quite accurate. I think your words might have been the problem there.
I also think that you are slightly deluded about your ability to convey "tone" in your writing. If I read it in my own voice, whether in a neutral, angry, happy, cheeky, surprised or disgusted tone, the meaning remains the same. As we were not currently engaged in a particularly friendly discourse, I understood the tone to be negative, irrelevant and pathetic, rather than jokey, cheeky, flirtatious, or whatever it was supposed to be.
Anyway, that's me. It was a fairly interesting discussion.
( ,
Fri 17 Oct 2008, 15:33,
archived)
I think my interpretation of that sentence was quite accurate. I think your words might have been the problem there.
I also think that you are slightly deluded about your ability to convey "tone" in your writing. If I read it in my own voice, whether in a neutral, angry, happy, cheeky, surprised or disgusted tone, the meaning remains the same. As we were not currently engaged in a particularly friendly discourse, I understood the tone to be negative, irrelevant and pathetic, rather than jokey, cheeky, flirtatious, or whatever it was supposed to be.
Anyway, that's me. It was a fairly interesting discussion.