
funny?
looks like i need loads of gene therapy to laugh at you...
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 14:44,
archived)
looks like i need loads of gene therapy to laugh at you...

your entire humour seems to be "bums and willies are funny".
Let me guess - you got a modem for Xmas.
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 14:45,
archived)
Let me guess - you got a modem for Xmas.

a modem convers digital signals in to analog and back again. broadband connections are digital anyway so a modulator/demodulator wouldn't be needed:P
I think it's more of a case of him being allowed to interact with the public with that little dobby stick attacked to his forehead so he can use the keyboard.
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 14:49,
archived)
I think it's more of a case of him being allowed to interact with the public with that little dobby stick attacked to his forehead so he can use the keyboard.

also all digital signals exist in the analog domain
lern2geeknooblar
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 15:06,
archived)
lern2geeknooblar

cable modems are still called modems even though they don't mo or dem.
in a related fact - MP3 codecs usually only dec, they rarely co.
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 20:35,
archived)
in a related fact - MP3 codecs usually only dec, they rarely co.

haven't seen "my entire humour" ...only a few posts here
silly billy
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 15:10,
archived)
silly billy

funny?
looks like i need loads of gene therapy to laugh at you...
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 20:35,
archived)
looks like i need loads of gene therapy to laugh at you...

Sometimes it's easy to confuse people absence with they being off licking their wounds.
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 15:25,
archived)

you are simply prone to being wrong more often that you realise
i win

( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 15:30,
archived)
i win


There's no reasoning with someone without reason.
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 16:13,
archived)

an ambiguous sentence.
You would have been better to type, "There is no reasoning with someone who is unable to reason."
As it stands, you leave open the possibility that reason itself is the thing that you are stating must be present (rather than merely the ability to reason on the part of he with whom you are arguing).
3/10. Must troll harder.
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 16:24,
archived)
You would have been better to type, "There is no reasoning with someone who is unable to reason."
As it stands, you leave open the possibility that reason itself is the thing that you are stating must be present (rather than merely the ability to reason on the part of he with whom you are arguing).
3/10. Must troll harder.

But grouping random words doesn't actually mean you've made anything cohereant.
( ,
Fri 26 Dec 2008, 14:46,
archived)