b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9214954 (Thread)

# a lady with metal work?
(I helped save b3ta! Neon Blue Ah ha ha haa! I feel positively capital!, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:18, archived)
# Yepp.
Only 6 piercings...so far.
(I helped save b3ta! Killerkitti Like my coffee black, just like my metal, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:23, archived)
# why?
(I helped save b3ta! Neon Blue Ah ha ha haa! I feel positively capital!, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:31, archived)
# Why
'so far'?
(I helped save b3ta! Killerkitti Like my coffee black, just like my metal, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:33, archived)
# :(
d(attractiveness)/d(piercings)=-k*piercings , k > 0
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:36, archived)
# I don't know what that means?
I'm not a math person.
(I helped save b3ta! Killerkitti Like my coffee black, just like my metal, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:38, archived)
# pretty much means, that attractiveness is a maximum at zero piercings
decreases as piercings increase.

but as I said down there V the problem requires an initial condition (ie initial attractiveness) to be completely specified.
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:50, archived)
# So someone could be really ugly and have no piercings
and they're at their maximum of atractiveness? So when they get more, they get uglier?
(I helped save b3ta! Killerkitti Like my coffee black, just like my metal, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:53, archived)
# only in my humblest of opinions.
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:55, archived)
# why is it a differential rate?
:)

and only first order
(I helped save b3ta! Neon Blue Ah ha ha haa! I feel positively capital!, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:43, archived)
# I didn't just want to write that it was an upside down parabola.
second you should be asking why the problem isn't completely specified.
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:47, archived)