b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9215017 (Thread)

# :(
d(attractiveness)/d(piercings)=-k*piercings , k > 0
(, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:36, archived)
# I don't know what that means?
I'm not a math person.
(, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:38, archived)
# pretty much means, that attractiveness is a maximum at zero piercings
decreases as piercings increase.

but as I said down there V the problem requires an initial condition (ie initial attractiveness) to be completely specified.
(, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:50, archived)
# So someone could be really ugly and have no piercings
and they're at their maximum of atractiveness? So when they get more, they get uglier?
(, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:53, archived)
# only in my humblest of opinions.
(, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:55, archived)
# why is it a differential rate?
:)

and only first order
(, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:43, archived)
# I didn't just want to write that it was an upside down parabola.
second you should be asking why the problem isn't completely specified.
(, Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:47, archived)