:(
d(attractiveness)/d(piercings)=-k*piercings , k > 0
(
k3b/-\b Peace man.,
Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:36,
archived)
I don't know what that means?
I'm not a math person.
(
Killerkitti Like my coffee black, just like my metal,
Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:38,
archived)
pretty much means, that attractiveness is a maximum at zero piercings
decreases as piercings increase.
but as I said down there V the problem requires an initial condition (ie initial attractiveness) to be completely specified.
(
k3b/-\b Peace man.,
Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:50,
archived)
So someone could be really ugly and have no piercings
and they're at their maximum of atractiveness? So when they get more, they get uglier?
(
Killerkitti Like my coffee black, just like my metal,
Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:53,
archived)
only in my humblest of opinions.
(
k3b/-\b Peace man.,
Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:55,
archived)
why is it a differential rate?
:)
and only first order
(
Neon Blue Ah ha ha haa! I feel positively capital!,
Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:43,
archived)
I didn't just want to write that it was an upside down parabola.
second you should be asking why the problem isn't completely specified.
(
k3b/-\b Peace man.,
Tue 24 Feb 2009, 22:47,
archived)