I have to agree
that b3ta is less readily understandable than Twitter
( ,
Wed 1 Apr 2009, 9:35,
archived)
b3ta's purpose is to make (and er ... appreciate) images
twitter's purpose can only really be to write/read short bits of text.
most people can write 140 chars, therefore there's not much skill involved, therefore it's obviously all nonsense
QED.
(brought to you by the tenuous logic department :)
( ,
Wed 1 Apr 2009, 9:43,
archived)
most people can write 140 chars, therefore there's not much skill involved, therefore it's obviously all nonsense
QED.
(brought to you by the tenuous logic department :)