i agree that their importance is based primarily on the social advances they helped to propagate, but i don't see how that is a bad thingalso, i am probably not entirely capable of a sustained intelligent debate at this hour and in my current state of mind
perhaps some other time though :D
i was brought up listening to the beatles, so my defence of them is probably mostly a knee-jerk reaction (fun fact: i took my username from 'i am the walrus')
(perhaps some other time though :D
i was brought up listening to the beatles, so my defence of them is probably mostly a knee-jerk reaction (fun fact: i took my username from 'i am the walrus')
Walrus Man Think hippy thoughts,
Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:19,
archived)
I didn't mean it was a bad thing.However, my main point is that they weren't anywhere near as innnovative as people made them out to be. Undoubtedly the biggest band of all time though, and I think the most important band of all time. However, I myself, like Smash, am not a massive fan.
(
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:23,
archived)