Yes but,
if it's taken zero effort and isn't even funny, why bother?
( ,
Sun 26 Apr 2009, 12:10,
archived)
So it's a threadwaste then.
But I don't see the brigade out slagging him off for that.
( ,
Sun 26 Apr 2009, 12:11,
archived)
well yes, quite, but then that takes it away from the realm of whether it's too tasteless or not for b3ta, and into the realm of quality control
( ,
Sun 26 Apr 2009, 12:12,
archived)
I have no problem with quick and shit when it's funny
But quality counts IMHO. People have to start somewhere though.
( ,
Sun 26 Apr 2009, 12:17,
archived)
aye, agreed
people DO have to start somewhere, and this could be this fella's 'start' on here.
and yes, imo quality counts as well, but the site does say that 'jokes are better than technique'. This may have been a cheap, throwaway laugh to the user, and expected the image to go the same way.
Differing senses of humour and all that
( ,
Sun 26 Apr 2009, 12:22,
archived)
and yes, imo quality counts as well, but the site does say that 'jokes are better than technique'. This may have been a cheap, throwaway laugh to the user, and expected the image to go the same way.
Differing senses of humour and all that
i'm not a fan of text inside a white box
it's almost as bad as red text that's been jpegged to death in ms paint
( ,
Sun 26 Apr 2009, 12:27,
archived)