b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9433097 (Thread)

#

(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:39, archived)
# yeah! yeah!
strong beaks.
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:40, archived)
# How does this one work for you?

(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:42, archived)
# :)

(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:43, archived)
# Awwwwwwwwwww!
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:44, archived)
# aw...
peace and love:
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:45, archived)
# How queer! ;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:46, archived)
# :)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:51, archived)
# Ha ha ha ha ha!
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:51, archived)
# haha!
lovely stuff...
I may steal this for my profile, if I may...
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:51, archived)
# pfft.
30 second shop. floor bird screamed out for it. Do what you will sir!
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:54, archived)
# but it's the idea
that makes it, and that's your property. Cheers!
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:56, archived)
# Stop pandering to him.
You do know he is ginger right? ;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:57, archived)
# yeah, I had heard...
but then some of my best friends are gingers. ;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:00, archived)
# Well you are clearly a man who is lacking in taste :P
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:01, archived)
# *adds to the list of insults to be addressed*
;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:01, archived)
# List of insults?
Come on now, it is the only thing I ever insult you about ;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:02, archived)
# It's like the fucking bible now ;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:03, archived)
# Pfft!
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:04, archived)
# Ooooh!
Reminds me of this:


(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:16, archived)
# oh yes!
that's ace...
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:21, archived)
# oh just wait untill that thing gets turned into drumsticks!
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:44, archived)
# Fuck you captain caveman :(
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:47, archived)
# there's so much irony in that comment
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:48, archived)
# Is there?
Being American I clearly can't spot it ;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:49, archived)
# humph.
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:50, archived)
# What the fuck has Humphrey Lyttleton got to do with any of this?
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:51, archived)
#
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:54, archived)
# That's clearly incorrect.
Being an English gent somewhat au fait with the etymology I would suggest that it is 'harrumph!'
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:59, archived)
# May I interject?
There would be no etymology in the classical sense for a word such as humph, harrumph or whatever as it is merely a manifestation, in alphic terms, of a sound, therefore rendering it purely ephemeral. Innit blud.
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:04, archived)
# surely in its use
as an intransitive verb it has an etymology which is echoic?
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:08, archived)
# Well yes, in theory it would have an etymology
based in onomatapaeic resonance, however, that would of course render it purely subjective, and therefore very difficult to prove wrong. Ya get me rasclart? ;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:11, archived)
# *lists*
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:13, archived)
# Ha ha ha!
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:14, archived)
# As an act of phatic communication,
it doesn't really matter what sound is made,
the facial expression and intonation is
just as important as the vocalisation,
in terms of meaning.
I think I'm agreeing with you.
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:16, archived)
# Undoubtedly.
It is the attempt to write such words that produces such issues :)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:19, archived)
# you are only considering it as a noun
when it can clearly be used as a verb and therefore not
onomatapaeic.
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:26, archived)
# That is may as well be,
but you were the one who brought up the etymology of said word.

The verb would quite patently have derived from the noun. Therefore, your point is moot. ;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:33, archived)
# moot
just means debatable. That's what I've been doing :P
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:36, archived)
# I was using it in the sense that it was
of no legal significance. So there :P
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:38, archived)
# FUCK!!
there, have another interjection to consider.
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:11, archived)
# Shut up maths boy!
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:14, archived)
# :(
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:18, archived)
# Don't be sad. You have maths.
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:24, archived)
# I heard he is shit at that too ;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:25, archived)
# that was unnecessary
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:28, archived)
# Yet still it made me laugh ;)
Sorry fella :D
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:37, archived)
# beak grading: 6.8
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:52, archived)
# These are some fine beaks....


What do you think?
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 0:53, archived)
# boobies!
plus bonus points for derek and clive.
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:11, archived)
# Cheers, they cost me a fortune.
But it was worth it to get Dr Rosenstein ;)
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:13, archived)
# BEAKS YOU ASK?!
(, Sat 9 May 2009, 1:41, archived)