Here is a very good place to roam:www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/
I actually have got to know the guy, and he's lovely, and not in Canon's payroll. His reviews are surprisingly accurate. For landscapes you want something nice and wide, though with a 400D I would watch your pennies; it would be pointless to splash out on an L-lens on a non full-frame body :)
(I actually have got to know the guy, and he's lovely, and not in Canon's payroll. His reviews are surprisingly accurate. For landscapes you want something nice and wide, though with a 400D I would watch your pennies; it would be pointless to splash out on an L-lens on a non full-frame body :)
Jahled Three shades of black,
Sat 9 May 2009, 20:05,
archived)
I must admit to being a complete newbie hereso I don't actually know what 'L-Lens' and 'non full frame body' mean!
I just had some spare cash and bought the 400d and now want to do more with it than take snaps!
(I just had some spare cash and bought the 400d and now want to do more with it than take snaps!
printmeister http://tinyurl.com/c8s8fd5 for titanic T's,
Sat 9 May 2009, 20:16,
archived)
Canon, like Nikon, is a good brand given their lens ranges are so extensive at all levelsCanon with the most versatile range
L-lens' are simply the best glass they produce, but come at at hideous cost. I spent £10K last year, and am making inroads on that this year
Full frame is a 'classic size' the camera shoots; most cameras are cropped; Wikipedia it :)
(L-lens' are simply the best glass they produce, but come at at hideous cost. I spent £10K last year, and am making inroads on that this year
Full frame is a 'classic size' the camera shoots; most cameras are cropped; Wikipedia it :)
Jahled Three shades of black,
Sat 9 May 2009, 20:28,
archived)
Thanks for that!The last 'serious' camera I had was a Zenit E (SLR on the cheap) back in the 70's!
so it's all new now!
(so it's all new now!
printmeister http://tinyurl.com/c8s8fd5 for titanic T's,
Sat 9 May 2009, 21:05,
archived)