so why suggest the title if you're not actually drawing Kings and Queens?Don't get me wrong people, I'm not adverse to lateral interpretation, but why not therefore have a lateral interpretation challeneg/compo/thread. See who can come up with the most fantastic left field approach to a subject?
I really don't get why itsso hard to get what I'm trying to do here :D
(I really don't get why itsso hard to get what I'm trying to do here :D
HappyToast Groat froth,
Mon 11 May 2009, 14:11,
archived)
ok! ok!I'll try and draw an actual historical personage.
*soothes and reassures*
it'll be crap, mind.
(*soothes and reassures*
it'll be crap, mind.
enceladus,
Mon 11 May 2009, 14:15,
archived)
i suggested the title as i felt it had potential for plenty of interest and interpretation = more peeps joining inwould be nothing wrong for example with doing a portrait of graham norton in fine regalia is there?
(
hekim 66 ÉŹĘš ŹÉnā² uooW,
Mon 11 May 2009, 14:26,
archived)
ok, you seem to have misunderstood the orginal point of the draw offpeople say what they want to draw and we draw it, it's quite literal.
( HappyToast Groat froth,
Mon 11 May 2009, 14:49,
archived)
my mistaketoo used to trying to answer briefs in an interesting & original way :)
Q: how many art directors does it take to change a light bulb?
A: does it have to be a light bulb?
(Q: how many art directors does it take to change a light bulb?
A: does it have to be a light bulb?
hekim 66 ÉŹĘš ŹÉnā² uooW,
Mon 11 May 2009, 14:57,
archived)