
also: The skin colouring could last longer in humans, however, as our metabolism is about eight times slower. Sweet.
( ,
Tue 28 Jul 2009, 11:59,
archived)

shouldn't be too hard.
( ,
Tue 28 Jul 2009, 12:01,
archived)

Just wait a couple of years before cosmetics companies figure out how to localise colour changes like that. Semi-permanent lipstick, eyeshadow, etc. People would buy it.
( ,
Tue 28 Jul 2009, 12:03,
archived)

and quite scary. All this talk of 'designer' babies, reminding everyone of WW2.
( ,
Tue 28 Jul 2009, 12:05,
archived)

It implies that the genetic changes are made only for aesthetic purposes (eye colour, hair, etc). If it's possible to delete/fix defective genes that would cause the child health trouble later in life, why not do it?
I'll have to stop myself here. It's one of the topics I tend to rant about :)
( ,
Tue 28 Jul 2009, 12:12,
archived)
I'll have to stop myself here. It's one of the topics I tend to rant about :)