b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9620614 (Thread)

# And at the same time
extradite anyone who doesn't conform to the 'given' way of thinking.


Oh...

ALSO IN OTHER NEWS EDIT:

I see the Daily Fail have finally sacked their picture editor... probably... as the job is up for grabs

jobs.guardian.co.uk/job/896079/picture-editorsresearchers/

Surely a B3tan could get this and break the system from within
(, Tue 4 Aug 2009, 9:13, archived)
# that's odd,
when I read this exact same news on the BBC website yesterday, it seemed far more moderate than that.
(, Tue 4 Aug 2009, 9:16, archived)
# Why on earth should political opinion come into it?
It doesn't into adoption tests.
(, Tue 4 Aug 2009, 9:16, archived)
# it doesn't,
it's just the Daily Mail being hysterical.
(, Tue 4 Aug 2009, 9:19, archived)
# Precisely. In the words of Chris TT
"All the worst people in Britain read the Daily Mail"
(, Tue 4 Aug 2009, 9:24, archived)
# I'd rather say that all the worst people write it,
because they know what they're doing, whereas the average man on the street can only take what they say at face value on the assumption that the media is not fundamentally corrupt. But the only alternative to that is state censorship. Hobson's choice...
(, Tue 4 Aug 2009, 9:29, archived)
# State censorship is very necesssary and something we're very happy with.
EG - military "intelligence" and state secrets.
(, Tue 4 Aug 2009, 9:32, archived)
# "We're"?
Who are you speaking for here? Are you the Queen?

I don't know if you'd be happy with making all government policy a state secret in case the Daily Mail reports it in a stupid way.
(, Tue 4 Aug 2009, 9:34, archived)
# I didn't say ALL govt info.
As for being the queen - for the right price I can be anyone you like, baby.
(, Tue 4 Aug 2009, 9:39, archived)
# No you didn't, but why not, eh?
Or how else can we deal with the Daily Mail problem?
(, Tue 4 Aug 2009, 9:41, archived)