b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Inappropriate TV Product Placement » Message 9704874

[challenge entry] If this has already been done, then those responsible should be ashamed of their lack of humour.

From the Inappropriate TV Product Placement challenge. See all 374 entries (closed)

(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 20:49, archived)
# i must read that book
:)
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 20:55, archived)
# Meh.
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 20:56, archived)
# It's better than Hitchens's attempt at the same topic.
Which isn't saying much.
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 20:57, archived)
# hahaha
:)
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 20:59, archived)
# that good huh!
:(
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 20:59, archived)
# I have read Dawkins in the past,
and enjoyed him a lot. But it seemed too preachy to me, which may well be missing the point.
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:03, archived)
# It is good.
Kinda preachy and value laden, personally I'd prefer just the facts, but still very worthwhile. What I like most is his sense of wonder at the natural world: "Here's how it all works and isn't it awesome!"
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:14, archived)
# As a scientific writer,
he is probably the best in the world in my opinion. However, I really didn't like The God Delusion. He is trying to use science to explain something that I don't think is possible. And before you accuse me of it, I am not a creationist, and I don't believe everything the bible says :)
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:22, archived)
# I don't come here to have that kind of argument :)
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:36, archived)
# it is very good
he himself is a little odd, but his clarity of thought is amazing
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:32, archived)
# It's fun if you like his style of sarcasm
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 20:58, archived)
# i think he is ace
:) loves taking down the creationists :)
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:00, archived)
# He is rubbish.
I am no short Earther, but 'You are all loonies' is no argument - the man is a fundamentalist cock.

also:

b3ta.com/board/9704345
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:03, archived)
# His argument as well is to very much
miss the distinction between Faith/Spiritualism and Religion.
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:04, archived)
# Indeed.
He argues against religion in ways which also oppose atheism at times as well, which would be fine if he was proclaiming agnosticism, but he's not, he's just a prick going 'SCIENCE, MOTHERFUCKERS!; without really getting it.

It's like a n00b b3ta tr0ll
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:07, archived)
# And the general attitude that to be a scientist
and "religious" is wholly incompatible. I was brought up in the Catholic Church my whole life and still consider myself to be a Catholic. My mother, who brought me up in said faith, has a First in Molecular Biology. Sounds like a scientist to me....
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:12, archived)
# Yer maw's a molecular biologist!
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:21, archived)
# Yer maw's an ape!
Oh, hang on a minute, no she isn't. God made her :P
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:22, archived)
# Ma maw's got a PhD, so git it right up ye!
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:35, archived)
# Well I like him.
;)
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:17, archived)
# Dodd, it's spelled Dodd.

(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 20:56, archived)
# How tickled I am!

(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:40, archived)
# This is not what product placement means.
Also, Dawkins is an unutterable penis.
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 20:57, archived)
# can one utter a penis? or just the word "penis"?
:)

"unutterable penis" sounds like a Lovecraftian epithet.
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:04, archived)
# Thank you.
(, Mon 21 Sep 2009, 21:08, archived)