b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 9716857 (Thread)

# ris?
Am i being thick? Dont get it.
(, Tue 29 Sep 2009, 18:53, archived)
# Yes
Check the file name, thicky.
(, Tue 29 Sep 2009, 18:55, archived)
# oh...ok.,....
i dont think i was being THAT thick....
(, Tue 29 Sep 2009, 19:10, archived)
# To recover
You could comment how Thalidomide was in fact a very effective drug but sadly released as a mixed isomer form when in fact it was only one isomer that was harmful (I believe R was safe and the S isomer harmful causing birth defects) thus heightening the tragedy of it all.
(, Tue 29 Sep 2009, 19:27, archived)
# SCIENCE!
*suitably impressed*
(, Tue 29 Sep 2009, 19:34, archived)
# apparently, the "safe" isomer
can be converted in the body to the harmful one   : (
(, Tue 29 Sep 2009, 19:50, archived)
# I didn't think this
could happen with optical isomerism.
(, Wed 30 Sep 2009, 17:22, archived)
# I'm afraid it can. I've been doing a little digging.
A similar thing happens with ibuprofen.
The non-active isomer gets converted (by an enzyme) to the active one (not the other way around, fortunately - otherwise it would be useless).

In the case of thalidomide, both isomers are active : one isomer suppresses morning sickness, the other causes birth defects.
Unfortunately, the beneficial isomer can be converted in your body to the harmful one, although I'm not sure if the conversion can go the other way.
(, Wed 30 Sep 2009, 23:20, archived)
# Science^2
Well, yes, but the two isomers can convert in-vivo, so although there is a safer form, I'd still not want to risk it.
(, Fri 2 Oct 2009, 19:27, archived)
# THICKO!
*points and laughs*
(, Tue 29 Sep 2009, 19:00, archived)
# Jesus would point too
but he has to swing around to do it ;)
(, Tue 29 Sep 2009, 19:03, archived)
# I had to filename.
w/y/h!
(, Tue 29 Sep 2009, 19:03, archived)
# I didn't get it either...
..really thick of me as Thalidomide is in the news constantly huh ?
(, Tue 29 Sep 2009, 22:20, archived)