ha the big fucking baby. i always thought it looked like he'd got at the paintpots again...TJ: anyone know who did this:
It's been half-inched...
www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/30/the-most-ironic-signs-of_n_518329.html?ref=twitter#s76979
(It's been half-inched...
www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/30/the-most-ironic-signs-of_n_518329.html?ref=twitter#s76979
Just Flange,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 17:30,
archived)
This is unshopped :
Someone had just scratched off a bit of text on the sign.
Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 17:48,
archived)
someone's fed that one a Jammie Dodger
Mighty Nibus who dares gins | @nibus,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 17:50,
archived)
I'd like to think that seagull did it.They're cleverer than we think...
(
enceladus,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 17:59,
archived)
It's a very very old pic234 hits on TinEye alone.
( Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 17:35,
archived)
so many things are getting pinched nowit pisses me off, although the person who shopped it probably didnt own the original photograph, but still if they have contributed to it, people shouldnt fucking nick it and claim it as their own
( FIEND,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 17:37,
archived)
I've seen so many people ranting about how this couldn't possibly be realoften citing that the bird is in the EXACT same position as the image.
What they fail to consider is that, above all else, THE SIGN MAKES NO SENSE. What would it even mean? "No birds allowed?"
(What they fail to consider is that, above all else, THE SIGN MAKES NO SENSE. What would it even mean? "No birds allowed?"
Digeridude Lord Wellington's Beef Trapeze,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 17:55,
archived)
No seagullsThis sign is quite common in open-air theatres, cos seagulls - attracted by noise and food - tend to shit on people
( Mighty Nibus who dares gins | @nibus,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 18:01,
archived)
ha! - or more precisely 'no terns allowed'I think it's a tern, anyway
*prepares to be corrected*
(*prepares to be corrected*
enceladus,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 18:02,
archived)
I've seen so many people ranting about how this couldn't possibly be sensical.Often citing that the sign couldn't mean anything.
What they fail to consider is that, above all else, THE BIRD IS IN THE EXACT SAME POSITION AS THE IMAGE.
(What they fail to consider is that, above all else, THE BIRD IS IN THE EXACT SAME POSITION AS THE IMAGE.
Curis,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 18:03,
archived)
If I made it, I'd take that as a complimentThat the internet believed the image is real.
( Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇,
Tue 30 Mar 2010, 18:16,
archived)