Oh FFS, go do some reading.
There is a whole battery of information out there demonstrating that they're perfectly safe to use for the vast, vast majority of people, and that the odds of you being harmed by the jab are orders of magnitude lower than the odds of you being seriously harmed by the disease.
I'm all for freedom of choice, but freedom of choice based upon incomplete, biased, or willfully misleading information is no choice at all.
Calling them "toxic" just shows your ignorance of the issues involved.
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:54,
Reply)
not ignorant of the subject just useing the arguments for and against
one camps calls it safe one camp calls it toxic who to believe?
studys conducted by biased studdy groups funded by the very companys that they are trialing or the fear mongers who want any and all vacinations to be provved safe by independant and transparent means?
to many times the industry influences the out come of studys in there favour is it any wonder people dont trust what the goverment and says?
(
fluffybunnykiller Is feasting on the clitoris of life, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:18,
Reply)
You're confusing 'arguments' with 'conspiracies'.
(
Dawn Of The Bread $$$$ E-THUG 4 LIFE - THAT'S HOW I SCROLL $$$$, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:24,
Reply)
What's the point in arguing with you?
If you're just going to airily dismiss any evidence of safety as evidence of conspiracy then you're just wasting everyone's time here.
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:43,
Reply)