
There is a whole battery of information out there demonstrating that they're perfectly safe to use for the vast, vast majority of people, and that the odds of you being harmed by the jab are orders of magnitude lower than the odds of you being seriously harmed by the disease.
I'm all for freedom of choice, but freedom of choice based upon incomplete, biased, or willfully misleading information is no choice at all.
Calling them "toxic" just shows your ignorance of the issues involved.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:54, Reply)

one camps calls it safe one camp calls it toxic who to believe?
studys conducted by biased studdy groups funded by the very companys that they are trialing or the fear mongers who want any and all vacinations to be provved safe by independant and transparent means?
to many times the industry influences the out come of studys in there favour is it any wonder people dont trust what the goverment and says?
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:18, Reply)

If you're just going to airily dismiss any evidence of safety as evidence of conspiracy then you're just wasting everyone's time here.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:43, Reply)

I mean proper trolling, not briefing. The Beeb consistently conflates these.
It would explain why "ignore" is in purple for that guy.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 22:47, Reply)