I think the actions of a party and how they protect those accused of serious crimes is very important.
TOTP?
Not just by Saville, but other presenters (throw a rock in 70's radio 1 pool of djs), performers and even crew have been implicated and last I looked investigations were still happening into that show.
(
Cerebus Sticky! Sticky! Stick! Stick!, Tue 21 Jul 2015, 14:59,
Reply)
Yes TOTP is probably a bad analogy.
Still I don't think the actions of individuals are anything to do with their associations/workplaces etc etc...
These crimes should be pointed at individuals and those who protected them, disregarding their association. It's just a personal opinion, I wouldn't want to taint the many with the actions of the few.
(
Fadgebadger Sweaty sumo wanks for everyone!, Tue 21 Jul 2015, 15:08,
Reply)
Ok here's one for you.
Members of the catholic church has been accused of child abuse, senior members have been accused of covering it up.
There's also reports of abuse in the methodist and Church of England.
When reporting on this should the nature of the church be mentioned?
Or should it be redacted in order to not taint other believers of the same church?
(
Cerebus Sticky! Sticky! Stick! Stick!, Tue 21 Jul 2015, 15:32,
Reply)
Yes it shouldn't be considered.
A VIP nonce abuses a position of power. That powerful position is relevant, although their beliefs or ideals are not.
(
Fadgebadger Sweaty sumo wanks for everyone!, Tue 21 Jul 2015, 16:06,
Reply)
Shall we agree to disagree?
We're running out of horizontal screen space and I hate it when it starts stacking the words in a message.
(
Cerebus Sticky! Sticky! Stick! Stick!, Tue 21 Jul 2015, 16:20,
Reply)
Ha!
Why can't /talk be this civilised =D
(
Fadgebadger Sweaty sumo wanks for everyone!, Tue 21 Jul 2015, 16:21,
Reply)
When I asked them, it turned out to be because my mum is a whining spastic.
(, Tue 21 Jul 2015, 17:13, Reply)