b3ta.com links
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 1379336 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post That expressions of anti semitism by any publicly elected politicians ought not be "considered a major party problem."
In addition to the fact that the media coverage of such events elicits this from you: "What the fuck is wrong with the media these days?" Presumably you'd favour a cover up.
Check and mate spaz features.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 16:18, , Reply)
This is a normal post impressive twisting of words, is this just comedy trolling or are you serious now?
You brought anti-semitism in to this, you seem quite obsessed, I was talking percentages, nothing more at the time.
It could have been 0.0012% of LibDem MPs saying they liked to rub their groins against stinging nettles in public, the question was how it is acceptable that that such a minority is taken as a majority in the eyes of the media.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 16:33, , Reply)
This is a normal post Ha ha ha. You're doing the comedy trolling.
Direct quotes, in context equal twisting of words according to you. Highly reminiscent of Labour's defence of Naz Shah: Journalists asked a spokesman for Jeremy Corbyn whether Mrs Shah was anti-Semitic. "We’re not suggesting she’s anti-Semitic,” said the spokesman. “We’re saying she’s made remarks that she doesn’t agree with.” Furthermore, how earth is it me who brought anti semitism into this? The whole substance of the story is anti semitism, alleged or actual, that's what the original link is all about. Maybe you should actually watch it.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 16:52, , Reply)
This is a normal post if you think that then you've really misunderstood what I typed
and yes, "considered a major party problem." is a direct quote, but not the bit you added to the start of it to make it about something else and not simply percentages.
I don't need to watch the clip now, I've read that it's about brillo pads and nazis. I'm not a fan of either.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 16:54, , Reply)
This is a normal post I quoted you directly, and did not use said quotes out of context. My reading comprehension is just fine.
You seem to think it's no big deal, hence what you said as I quoted. I think anti semitism is a big deal. Especially when it comes from a publicly elected official, regardless of what percentage of publicly elected officials from any party that they make up.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 16:59, , Reply)
This is a normal post round and round in circles

(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 17:08, , Reply)
This is a normal post You've lost the matter of the argument, so you resort to trying to discredit the method of argument.
There is nothing circular about my argument; it is entirely linear. Repetitive perhaps, but when you argue with someone who is evasive and disingenuous, that's not a crime.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 17:13, , Reply)
This is a normal post I've lost the argument in as much as you refuse to hear what I am saying
I can't be bothered any more. In no way am I defending any anti-semite MP tosspots as you think and in no way am I saying anti-semitism isn't a big deal.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 17:17, , Reply)
This is a normal post You started out saying it was no biggie.
Now you concede it is.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 17:38, , Reply)
This is a normal post ffs my view on that didn't change
I said 0.0012% is not big, numbers, not subjects
(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 17:49, , Reply)
This is a normal post I'd like to see your scurrilous data held up to analysis.
Is that a percentage of Labour MPs? Or all Labour Party members? Define your terms.
(, Thu 28 Apr 2016, 23:44, , Reply)
This is a normal post He defined them further up the thread, you even replied to it - were you drunk again by the time you got back round to posting this?
To quote a leading authority - "you thick cunt".
(, Fri 29 Apr 2016, 9:34, , Reply)