Someone exchanged gunfire with him on his way in to the club.
So your "If only we all had guns!!" logic doesn't really hold true.
Maybe the guy who exchanged gunfire didn't have a high calibre gun like the other guy though, so maybe you all need BIGGER GUNS.
So where does it all end? You all drive around in tanks? Then someone will get a bigger tank, and it will all start again.
(
Dawn Of The Bread $$$$ E-THUG 4 LIFE - THAT'S HOW I SCROLL $$$$, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 14:33,
Share,
Reply)
First I heard that someone exchanged gunfire with him. Did they shoot at him out of the blue, or because he looked threatening?
Actually, the reports say he shot the armed security guard in front of the club. Then he held unarmed hostages for four hours, slowly killing them at will.
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 14:52,
Share,
Reply)
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-36511778
How you couldn't have heard about him exchanging gunfire at the entrance is beyond me, i think you pick the stuff that backs up your opinions and ignore everything else.
Nice tank, by the way.
(
Dawn Of The Bread $$$$ E-THUG 4 LIFE - THAT'S HOW I SCROLL $$$$, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 14:55,
Share,
Reply)
Well, this is exactly what I said, right? He shot the armed security guard (an off duty police officer)
He shot a bunch of people, then the cops showed up. He shot at the cops, then he holed up with unarmed hostages. And an AR15 is not an "automatic rifle".
I suspect if he had been an anti abortion nutter who threw dynamite into a club full of abortionists we would be speaking of hate and larger zones of protection rather than dynamite control.
I bought the tank to match my shorts.
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 16:16,
Share,
Reply)
"If only someone there had a gun...."
*supplies evidence that someone had a gun and exchanged gunfire with him (doesn't matter if they were in the club or outside, by your logic a man with a gun can stop a man with a gun - hence you wanting everyone to have guns)*
"First I heard that someone exchanged gunfire with him."
*supplies evidence*
"Well, this is exactly what I said, right?"
O-K-A-Y.
I'm just going to leave you to it.
Be safe.
(
Dawn Of The Bread $$$$ E-THUG 4 LIFE - THAT'S HOW I SCROLL $$$$, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 16:33,
Share,
Reply)
You are correct with your hence. It was clear that one man wasn't enough. But that's been proven repeatedly at school shootings.
Thank you, you be safe as well. Avoid areas that the muzzies are targeting.
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 16:45,
Share,
Reply)
Just let me refer you to your first comment in this thread, where you state it's too bad "AT LEAST ONE PERSON" wasn't armed.
You're very confusing and potentially mentally unwell.
(
Dawn Of The Bread $$$$ E-THUG 4 LIFE - THAT'S HOW I SCROLL $$$$, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 16:55,
Share,
Reply)
You're right, I did say "too bad at least one person wasn't armed."
I should have said, "too bad more people in the venue weren't armed."
You always catch me at my evil ways, but I still love you Bready.
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 18:28,
Share,
Reply)
The reporter describes it as an "assault rifle"
The interviewee is the person calling it an "automatic rifle". I suggest you take up the matter with her. You'll soon find out whether people on the wrong end of it consider the distinction to be important.
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 17:10,
Share,
Reply)
You're right, the distinction is ludicrous and only really used by politicians to fear monger.
The only distinction is cosmetic, i.e. does it look "scary". It has nothing to do with caliber or semi vs. fully automatic.
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 18:29,
Share,
Reply)
The scary thing isn't the name.
Nor the look.
Nor the caliber.
Nor the fact that it's only a semi-automatic.
The scary thing is that any fucking fucked-up fuckhead can get hold of an assault rifle at the drop of a hat. Your gun laws are quite literally arming terrorists.
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 22:32,
Share,
Reply)
I think AK-47s are illegal in France, yet that didn't really stop anything did it?
And with the voter registration drive at the southern border, narco, sex slave and arms traffickers are having a field day (I'm not even mentioning the arms sent by the current administration to Mexico, resulting in the death of at least one federal agent and thousands of Mexicans - that was supposed to make guns look bad). I know of no other country so negligent with their own borders. Maybe Europe...
When people speak of the muslims, they say, "we can't generalize for political advantage", but don't seem to have the same muzzle for their anti-gun rules.
And neither the laws on the books, nor the laws that the president recommends would have stopped this nutcase. Only left more law abiding people without a means to defend themselves.
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Tue 14 Jun 2016, 22:54,
Share,
Reply)
