I missed the part in this where it said the doctor who wrote it refused to verify it.
It seemed to be a critique of letterheads, syntax and how the "doctor" who wrote the article wouldn't write a generic letter to the public that way. Where does it say the doctor refused to verify it?
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Wed 17 Aug 2016, 19:39,
Share,
Reply)
Don't you find it the slightest bit odd
that the first person on said letterhead died in 2010?
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Wed 17 Aug 2016, 20:48,
Share,
Reply)
We all die wheresthefish
and if we are lucky, we will remain on a letterhead.
(
gaijintendo Regular Member, Wed 17 Aug 2016, 22:39,
Share,
Reply)
Woah!
Deep!
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Wed 17 Aug 2016, 22:54,
Share,
Reply)
They do that with law firms and medical practices. The name can mean big $$
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Wed 17 Aug 2016, 23:13,
Share,
Reply)
Of course the alleged doctor hasn't "refused to verify" the letter.
Said doctor would have to exist insofar as being able to be reached for verification. It's that "you can't prove a negative" thing.
(
BaronMunchausen Interdimensional Demon Day Laborer, Wed 17 Aug 2016, 21:24,
Share,
Reply)
You're clutching at straws, that letter was obviously the product of a loony.
No plausible doctor, or legitimate doctor, would ever write a letter like that. But at least he didn't use his favourite word (tremendous) in it.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Wed 17 Aug 2016, 23:59,
Share,
Reply)