![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Objectively you can't see where robots begin and end when they fight. The plot and dialogue are like a seven year olds. The camera work is like a porn film (following peoples arses around in crowds, peering down tops etc.) it's bad. High School Musical is cheesy as fuck and aimed at young girls, but it's objectively a lot better than Transformers ....let alone the four sequels.
( , Tue 18 Apr 2017, 12:27, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
'corny film targeting young boys' = apalling waste of time.
Yep, that's about the gist of his case too.
And just to clarify, you're saying one of those films should also be judged on its endless parade of tired sequels and the other shouldn't?
( , Tue 18 Apr 2017, 14:17, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
whereas Transforms isn't good, even if you normally like that sort of thing.
( , Tue 18 Apr 2017, 14:31, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
When one doesn't like the 'thing' in question.
By what category do you classify a thing you don't like as thing you normally would like?
Personally I think the two films are roughly on a par, with obvious hooks for the target audience (in the case of Transformers, flash, bang, wallop, tits, and High School Musical has shallow social drama, perfect coreography, and unattainable late 20s boyfriends). Their success and sequels are almost perfectly matched. To laud one over the other is simply the bias of inauthentic liberalism.
( , Tue 18 Apr 2017, 15:14, Share, Reply)
![This is a normal post](/images/board_posticon.gif)
big budget action films with lots of special effects, or someone who just digs the work of Michael Bay generally, and then hate Transformers because the effects were uninterpretable garbage and because Bay massively over-indulged himself.
( , Tue 18 Apr 2017, 18:30, Share, Reply)