He really needs holding to task over this despite his change of heart.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MP0CGc9DdwQ&t=0m57s
For an earlier example of his idiocy.
( , Mon 17 Jun 2019, 23:22, Share, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MP0CGc9DdwQ&t=0m57s
For an earlier example of his idiocy.
( , Mon 17 Jun 2019, 23:22, Share, Reply)
Sandy Hook Victims lawyers asked for all Infowars emails
So infowars sent the entire dump of all their email servers since like forever. In the past some jerks had sent emails to infowars accounts containing child porn. So the dump contained child porn.
( , Mon 17 Jun 2019, 23:50, Share, Reply)
So infowars sent the entire dump of all their email servers since like forever. In the past some jerks had sent emails to infowars accounts containing child porn. So the dump contained child porn.
( , Mon 17 Jun 2019, 23:50, Share, Reply)
as other conspiracy theorist react when challenged, this is essentially answering one claim by making a lot of other unsubstantiated claims
-that the child porn on Jones computers was only derived from other people unwanted emails
-that the child porn sent to the victims only took the form of forwarded emails from unwanted trolls, something the victims have not acknowledged
-and that Jones himself is not claiming inadvertent disclosure as part of a release of emails in discovery, which would be the standard explanation for the above, but that his lawyer had "deliberately set him up". He claims his lawyer "planted" the evidence, which contradicts your defence of him.
So do you have anything which corroborates your claims, as I read some articles this morning which made no mention of emails, other than self-confessed liar Jones himself? Or was it something you heard on these rightwing message boards?
( , Tue 18 Jun 2019, 0:21, Share, Reply)
-that the child porn on Jones computers was only derived from other people unwanted emails
-that the child porn sent to the victims only took the form of forwarded emails from unwanted trolls, something the victims have not acknowledged
-and that Jones himself is not claiming inadvertent disclosure as part of a release of emails in discovery, which would be the standard explanation for the above, but that his lawyer had "deliberately set him up". He claims his lawyer "planted" the evidence, which contradicts your defence of him.
So do you have anything which corroborates your claims, as I read some articles this morning which made no mention of emails, other than self-confessed liar Jones himself? Or was it something you heard on these rightwing message boards?
( , Tue 18 Jun 2019, 0:21, Share, Reply)
I got in an online argument with one jones supporter a few months back, and it was like trying to nail jelly to the wall
I'm possibly overcompensating for that by arcing up here
( , Tue 18 Jun 2019, 1:57, Share, Reply)
I'm possibly overcompensating for that by arcing up here
( , Tue 18 Jun 2019, 1:57, Share, Reply)
it's the tantalising prospect that lends the situation its erotic frisson
( , Tue 18 Jun 2019, 10:28, Share, Reply)
( , Tue 18 Jun 2019, 10:28, Share, Reply)
I read it as 'flies'
and imagined in montage fashion Alex Jones spending months cruelly training flies to carry tiny obscene images.
( , Tue 18 Jun 2019, 8:02, Share, Reply)
and imagined in montage fashion Alex Jones spending months cruelly training flies to carry tiny obscene images.
( , Tue 18 Jun 2019, 8:02, Share, Reply)
YouTube once recommended me an
interview with him and David Lynch, as their way of trying to radicalise me.
David Lynch was more of a truther than I'd imagine, but Alex Jones seemed to actually be a fan and had a genuine interest in his films. I mean, it was still a shit interview, but odd to hear him show an interest in the arts.
( , Tue 18 Jun 2019, 19:38, Share, Reply)
interview with him and David Lynch, as their way of trying to radicalise me.
David Lynch was more of a truther than I'd imagine, but Alex Jones seemed to actually be a fan and had a genuine interest in his films. I mean, it was still a shit interview, but odd to hear him show an interest in the arts.
( , Tue 18 Jun 2019, 19:38, Share, Reply)