Racist landlord sue Youtuber for calling him rude names
Not for calling him racist (which the racist denies) but for the rude names.
Risky. If it goes to court and he loses (slander) then everyone can legally call him "bumsplatter of a man" "a penis" "a racist dickwad" or "a hypocritical saucer of tit milk"
(
Ambegris likes his tea stirred anti-clockwise, Tue 17 Sep 2019, 19:56,
Reply)
If it was on YouTube it was libel, not slander.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Tue 17 Sep 2019, 20:21,
Reply)
I thought libel had to be written?
(
Ambegris likes his tea stirred anti-clockwise, Tue 17 Sep 2019, 20:23,
Reply)
No. That's the handy portmanteau for a blood libel.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Tue 17 Sep 2019, 21:08,
Reply)
nearly
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_of_Babel
(
artifus is doing it all wrong, Tue 17 Sep 2019, 22:29,
Reply)
Historically, I think so. Broadcasting changed all that.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Tue 17 Sep 2019, 21:04,
Reply)
Live and learn.
Thanks.
(
Ambegris likes his tea stirred anti-clockwise, Tue 17 Sep 2019, 22:08,
Reply)
This was early last year.
It was thrown straight out of court. YouTuber's lawyers were pro bono, so the racist cunt's wife, who was the actual claimant, had to pay £3000 to pro bono law charity, just because she's the kind of racist cunt's cunt wife who'd try and get money from a person after they'd correctly broadcasted about what a cunt her odious fat racist cunt of a husband was.
(
George Blank my 2nd last sig was funny, Tue 17 Sep 2019, 21:40,
Reply)
