
There is a video game.
It contains dialogue describing a desire to rape a 12 year old child.
dogbomb made a video ahout that game.
He may have not known about that part of the game.
Do you dispute any of those statements?
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 4:51, Reply)

He probably even reviewed games where the characters want to murder each other. I hear young people even shoot guns in those terrible video games!
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 7:36, Reply)

It contains dialog about the desire to rape underage boys, and scenes of bestiality, incest, racism, xenophobia, and homophobia.
This video is available on the Comic Strip Youtube channel.
Isn't it possible that Phucker in the Woods is a parody, and not actually advocating paedophilia?
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 7:51, Reply)

Admit it - you're actually a Mr Penis sock puppet, aren't you?
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 7:52, Reply)

I agree with you that there is indeed a video game.
It does indeed contain the dialogue that you spam here every week.
Dogbomb did indeed make a video of himself playing that game.
Dogbomb almost certainly did not know about the part of the game containing the one line of dialogue you keep spamming.
Do you accept that there is a mountain of evidence that you are fundamentally wrong about
- the nature of the game?
- the content of the game?
- how the game presents paedophilia?
Do you actually accept that it is possible to address the issue of paedophilia in a way that does not normalise or glorify paedophilia?
Under what circumstances can you imagine yourself admitting that you are wrong? What standard of proof would you require?
How would you feel if someone repeatedly and systematically slandered you with 'paedo stuff'?
The onus is on you to prove that dogbomb, Youtube, Steam, and seemingly everybody else in the world, are all wrong.
( , Sat 4 Jul 2020, 15:44, Reply)