that shot never looked good when it was first released, surprised it wasn't cut
but I think it's fine too, I don't think you're supposed to look at special effects too closely, including the ones in modern films, short cuts and stock particle effects etc. aren't difficult to spot
a few of my favourite films have "early CG" that wouldn't be considered good enough for a modern film, even though it was state-of-the-art at the time, but it doesn't matter because everything else is great
( , Sun 27 Sep 2020, 17:37, Share, Reply)
but I think it's fine too, I don't think you're supposed to look at special effects too closely, including the ones in modern films, short cuts and stock particle effects etc. aren't difficult to spot
a few of my favourite films have "early CG" that wouldn't be considered good enough for a modern film, even though it was state-of-the-art at the time, but it doesn't matter because everything else is great
( , Sun 27 Sep 2020, 17:37, Share, Reply)
Talos coming to life is still fantastic, and that’s from 1963
Helped by brilliantly horrible sound effects as well.
youtu.be/SNg4KZKG96o
( , Sun 27 Sep 2020, 19:00, Share, Reply)
Helped by brilliantly horrible sound effects as well.
youtu.be/SNg4KZKG96o
( , Sun 27 Sep 2020, 19:00, Share, Reply)
It has charm and style but not realism.
It looked shonky by the 80s when I first saw it as a child. ESB's tauntauns only look slightly better.
The Harryhausen low frame rate stop motion style still suits insects, reptiles and birds mind you.
( , Sun 27 Sep 2020, 19:43, Share, Reply)
It looked shonky by the 80s when I first saw it as a child. ESB's tauntauns only look slightly better.
The Harryhausen low frame rate stop motion style still suits insects, reptiles and birds mind you.
( , Sun 27 Sep 2020, 19:43, Share, Reply)