Your arguments are not convincing because you come across as an ideologically brainwashed National Front type.
Pro-tip: If you ask someone if they are illiterate, you will undermine your argument a lot less if you use a question mark rather than a full stop.
As I don't want to lie for a living, getting an undergraduate law degree seems like a waste of time and money.
You do not present as law graduate material, especially when you drunkenly mistake me for SockCooker and call me a paedophile. You do not present as a law graduate because your rhetorical style and logical capacity are so stunted.
I can't be bothered to go through your posts pointing out everything that's wrong in them. Suffice to say, your insults do not help your self destructive cause, which is shared by the National Front, Britain First, BNP, UKIP, etc.
(
brb man-child cuck corporate supplicant fuck, Thu 7 Jan 2021, 14:31,
Reply)
*Sighs*
They’re not arguments, they’re factual statements about how the various presidents of the eu get to be president of the institution they’re head of. This is not anti eu propaganda, it’s all information available on the eu’s own website.
You say you can’t be bothered to point out where I’m wrong. The truth is that you can’t refute what I’m saying because it’s factually accurate. So you resort to the utterly puerile “he’s anti-eu, therefore he’s brainwashed/racist/evil” bullshit, and completely avoid the issues being discussed. Utterly pathetic.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Thu 7 Jan 2021, 16:58,
Reply)
You can only present something wrong as a statement of fact, while being wrong.
The truth is I'm bored of this bendy bananas level of wrongness that you keep spouting.
Your rhetorical style is how fascists grind down their opposition, you make a false claim, then defend it with 16 more false claims, and defend each of those with yet more false claims, until there's just too much bullshit to wade through and the original point is forgotten. Those wise enough to walk away appear to concede.
It is an accurate and true statement of fact that the EU elects its institutional presidents. You agree. I'm happy. Good day to you.
(
brb man-child cuck corporate supplicant fuck, Thu 7 Jan 2021, 17:55,
Reply)
The citizens of the eu don’t elect these presidents, directly or indirectly through representatives who they have voted for, as I have extensively explained.
You even conceded that the ‘election’ of the president of the commission, arguably the most powerful individual vis à vis international trade, is unsatisfactory. All these elections are a travesty of democracy, and you know it.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Fri 8 Jan 2021, 1:24,
Reply)
You're calling them elections routinely now. This is progress! I'll make a sane man of you yet, my boy.
The subjects of the UK have no democratic way to select who represents them in our 2nd house. The subjects of the UK have no way of choosing their head of state, because God appoints our head of state through birth into a German aristocracy.
If you hate the anti-democratic elements of European bureaucracy, surely you must hate the aristocracy and especially the British monarchy, right?
We should campaign for a British republic together.
(
brb man-child cuck corporate supplicant fuck, Fri 8 Jan 2021, 15:01,
Reply)