I meant the fuel is vastly more concentrated than occurs in nature.
Some are synthetic, like the various isotopes of plutonium.
When the people were bussed out of the area, I doubt they took pets, most of which would starve.
(
FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector., Sat 20 Feb 2021, 2:05,
Reply)
>more concentrated than occurs in nature.
where on earth is it occurring then, and how?
(
artifus is doing it all wrong, Sat 20 Feb 2021, 2:10,
Reply)
You are using an excessively strict interpretation of natural.
Far more than would be usually expected in such a milieu as this.
(
FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector., Sat 20 Feb 2021, 2:16,
Reply)
less science more fiction - got it
might start my own religion soon
(
artifus is doing it all wrong, Sat 20 Feb 2021, 2:18,
Reply)
your personal definition of words outside accepted norms ≠ science
The oxford definition gives the condition in the definition: "not made or caused by humans". this is the one that is widely accepted. if you were to ask ordinary people whether a nuclear power plant, a tree, uranium ore dug up, or processed uranium, were natural, they'd say, no, yes, yes, no, because unlike you and brb, they have a good grasp on what the term means. however, if brb wants to hold on to this all-encompassing personal definition of natural, then why use it defend nuclear power plants?
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sat 20 Feb 2021, 4:07,
Reply)
...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFaN9_n_7Uw
(
artifus is doing it all wrong, Sat 20 Feb 2021, 4:13,
Reply)
