That's been ny argument for a long time.
And given how I've not procreated, I can argue that I'm more carbon neutral by definition, so therefore am allowed to spend my carbon budget on other things.
Nothing to do with being a miserable old git, you understand.
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 19:29, Reply)
What? With the money I've saved by not having children? And the lifetime mortgage I put on the house once I finally retire since I won't be obligated to leave it to the ungrateful brats I raised?
Hookers, of course. Lots and lots of Hookers. And maybe a robot butler.
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 20:07, Reply)
But I see a teensy tiny flaw.
"With the money I've saved"
Hmmm.... I never realised that was how it was supposed to work.
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 21:18, Reply)
(, Mon 10 Jan 2022, 21:54, Reply)
hence the tax break when you pay in and the tax when it pays out
(, Tue 11 Jan 2022, 9:57, Reply)
if you do not reproduce, you can drive a car, go on a transatlantic holiday every year, eat meat, wash your clothes at 60 degrees, use a tumble dryer, not recycle, and use old school lightbulbs and still be less than 10% as polluting as a vegan parent, who doesn't drive, fly, washes clothes in cold water, hang dries those clothes, recycles, and uses low energy lightbulbs.
My view is that each person has a CO2 allowance, sort of like carbon credits, and you can use yours however you like.
I use mine on a nice car, foreign holiday, electricity, and meat. I still have nearly 90% of my allowance left compared to being a parent, so I donate that to the real polluters.
Most vegans I know have children, often more than 1. They should really be doing more for the planet though, don't they have any shame for their actions?
Research: iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541
(, Wed 12 Jan 2022, 19:15, Reply)